What do systematic reviews say?

Exercise vs no exercise

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Exercise interventions for adults with cancer receiving radiation therapy alone 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Exercise vs no exercise

• Exercise interventions for adults with cancer receiving radiation therapy alone 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 45 participants
  Very low

Surgical interventions (exploration and decompression / external neurolysis, internal neurolysis, neurorrhaphy / direct repair, neuroma excision, anastomosis, autologous or allograft nerve grafting or tubulization) vs conservative interventions

• Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating acromioclavicular dislocation of the shoulder in adults 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 112 participants
  Low

Surgical interventions (exploration and decompression / external neurolysis, internal neurolysis, neurorrhaphy / direct repair, neuroma excision, anastomosis, autologous or allograft nerve grafting or tubulization) vs conservative interventions

It is very uncertain whether surgical intervention changes pain: presence of pain (slight or moderate) at 1 year compared with conservative intervention (very low certainty).

• Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating acromioclavicular dislocation of the shoulder in adults 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.32 [0.54, 3.19]
  1 study · 79 participants
  Very low

Surgical interventions (exploration and decompression / external neurolysis, internal neurolysis, neurorrhaphy / direct repair, neuroma excision, anastomosis, autologous or allograft nerve grafting or tubulization) vs conservative interventions

It is very uncertain whether surgical intervention changes treatment failure (usually requiring a subsequent operation) at 1 year compared with conservative intervention (very low certainty).

• Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating acromioclavicular dislocation of the shoulder in adults 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.99 [0.51, 1.94]
  6 studies · 342 participants
  Very low

Surgical interventions (exploration and decompression / external neurolysis, internal neurolysis, neurorrhaphy / direct repair, neuroma excision, anastomosis, autologous or allograft nerve grafting or tubulization) vs conservative interventions

Surgical intervention showed no clear difference in number of participants to return to work/sport ‐ at 1 year compared with conservative intervention (low certainty).

• Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating acromioclavicular dislocation of the shoulder in adults 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.96 [0.85, 1.1]
  2 studies · 137 participants
  Low

Surgical interventions (exploration and decompression / external neurolysis, internal neurolysis, neurorrhaphy / direct repair, neuroma excision, anastomosis, autologous or allograft nerve grafting or tubulization) vs conservative interventions

• Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating acromioclavicular dislocation of the shoulder in adults 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 122 participants
  Low

Surgical interventions (exploration and decompression / external neurolysis, internal neurolysis, neurorrhaphy / direct repair, neuroma excision, anastomosis, autologous or allograft nerve grafting or tubulization) vs conservative interventions

It is very uncertain whether surgical intervention changes participants with adverse events at 1 year compared with conservative intervention (very low certainty).

• Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating acromioclavicular dislocation of the shoulder in adults 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 2.82 [1.65, 4.82]
  6 studies · 342 participants
  Very low

Surgical interventions (exploration and decompression / external neurolysis, internal neurolysis, neurorrhaphy / direct repair, neuroma excision, anastomosis, autologous or allograft nerve grafting or tubulization) vs conservative interventions

It is very uncertain whether surgical intervention changes patient dissatisfaction with the cosmetic result at 1 yearh compared with conservative intervention (very low certainty).

• Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating acromioclavicular dislocation of the shoulder in adults 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.34 [0.07, 1.62]
  1 study · 70 participants
  Very low

Surgical interventions (exploration and decompression / external neurolysis, internal neurolysis, neurorrhaphy / direct repair, neuroma excision, anastomosis, autologous or allograft nerve grafting or tubulization) vs non‐surgical treatment

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Surgical interventions for symptomatic mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Extended intervention vs brief intervention

• Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 552 participants
  Low

Extended intervention vs brief intervention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Extended intervention vs brief intervention

• Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 147 participants
  Low

Extended intervention vs brief intervention

• Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 147 participants
  Very low

Extended intervention vs no intervention or minimal intervention

• Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  6 studies · 1296 participants
  Moderate

Extended intervention vs no intervention or minimal intervention

• Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 456 participants
  Moderate

Extended intervention vs no intervention or minimal intervention

• Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 319 participants
  Moderate

Extended intervention vs no intervention or minimal intervention

• Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 158 participants
  Low

Skin care intervention vs standard skin care or no skin care intervention

Skin care intervention showed no clear difference in eczema diagnosis by 1 to 3 years compared with standard skin care or no skin care intervention (moderate certainty).

• Skin care interventions in infants for preventing eczema and food allergy 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.03 [0.81, 1.31]
  7 studies · 3075 participants
  Moderate

Skin care intervention vs standard skin care or no skin care intervention

Skin care intervention showed no clear difference in igE‐mediated food allergy (oral food challenge) by 1 to 3 years compared with standard skin care or no skin care intervention (low certainty).

• Skin care interventions in infants for preventing eczema and food allergy 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 2.53 [0.99, 6.49]
  1 study · 976 participants
  Low