evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

2,183 questions · 2,385 findings · 241 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 558 · 23.4%GRADE not reported 158 · 6.6%Very low 704 · 29.5%Low 618 · 25.9%Moderate 276 · 11.6%High 71 · 3%

Multi‐component intervention vs no intervention

Proportion of participants with low back pain/discomfort · sedentary workers with musculoskeletal symptoms

Multi‐component intervention showed no clear difference in proportion of participants with low back pain/discomfort compared with no intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Multi‐component intervention vs no intervention

Proportion of participants with upper back pain/discomfort · sedentary workers with musculoskeletal symptoms

Multi‐component intervention showed no clear difference in proportion of participants with upper back pain/discomfort compared with no intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Multi‐component intervention vs no intervention

Proportion of participants with neck pain/discomfort · sedentary workers with musculoskeletal symptoms

Multi‐component intervention showed no clear difference in proportion of participants with neck pain/discomfort compared with no intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Multi‐component intervention vs no intervention

Proportion of participants with shoulder pain/discomfort · sedentary workers with musculoskeletal symptoms

It is very uncertain whether multi‐component intervention changes proportion of participants with shoulder pain/discomfort compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

MDAC + hospital intervention vs SDAC + hospital intervention

Incidence and severity of symptoms of poisoning: incidence of need for intubation · first aid in patients with acute oral poisoning (carbamazepine, yellow oleander, or combinations of different drugs)

MDAC + hospital intervention showed no clear difference in incidence and severity of symptoms of poisoning: incidence of need… compared with SDAC + hospital intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

MDAC + hospital intervention vs hospital intervention

Incidence and severity of symptoms of poisoning: incidence of need for intubation · first aid in patients with acute oral poisoning (benzodiazepines, yellow oleander or combinations of different drugs)

MDAC + hospital intervention showed no clear difference in incidence and severity of symptoms of poisoning: incidence of need… compared with hospital intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Community health educational interventions vs control

Neonatal mortality · developing countries

Community health educational interventions may leads to lower neonatal mortality compared with control (low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Community health educational interventions vs control

Early neonatal mortality · developing countries

It is very uncertain whether community health educational interventions changes early neonatal mortality compared with control (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Community health educational interventions vs control

Late neonatal mortality · developing countries

It is very uncertain whether community health educational interventions changes late neonatal mortality compared with control (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Community health educational interventions vs control

Perinatal mortality · developing countries

Community health educational interventions probably leads to lower perinatal mortality compared with control (moderate certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Any of the interventions (CR, SE, SW, sealing with sealant materials, Hall Technique, or NRCC) vs Each other, placebo, or no treatment

Adverse events (any type) and safety of sealant · Children and/or adults with permanent or primary teeth, vital (sensitive) pulps, and cavitated or dentine carious lesions conventionally…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Any of the interventions (CR, SE, SW, sealing with sealant materials, Hall Technique, or NRCC) vs Each other, placebo, or no treatment

Subjective evaluation of the treatments by participants · Children and/or adults with permanent or primary teeth, vital (sensitive) pulps, and cavitated or dentine carious lesions conventionally…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review