What do systematic reviews say?

Multi‐component intervention with consumers and providers working in partnership vs the same intervention without partnership

• Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  Very low

Multi‐component intervention with consumers and providers working in partnership vs the same intervention without partnership

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Multi‐component intervention with consumers and providers working in partnership vs the same intervention without partnership

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Multi‐component intervention with consumers and providers working in partnership vs the same intervention without partnership

• Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  Very low

Multi‐component intervention with consumers and providers working in partnership vs the same intervention without partnership

• Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  Very low

Multi‐component intervention with consumers and providers working in partnership vs the same intervention without partnership

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Light interventions (5/7): Bright light alone during day vs normal light (300 lux) plus placebo capsule

• Person‐directed, non‐pharmacological interventions for sleepiness at work and sleep disturbances caused by shift work 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 12 participants
  Very low

Light interventions (5/7): Bright light alone during day vs normal light (300 lux) plus placebo capsule

• Person‐directed, non‐pharmacological interventions for sleepiness at work and sleep disturbances caused by shift work 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 13 participants
  Very low

Light interventions (5/7): Bright light alone during day vs normal light (300 lux) plus placebo capsule

• Person‐directed, non‐pharmacological interventions for sleepiness at work and sleep disturbances caused by shift work 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 13 participants
  Very low

Light interventions (5/7): Bright light alone during day vs normal light (300 lux) plus placebo capsule

• Person‐directed, non‐pharmacological interventions for sleepiness at work and sleep disturbances caused by shift work 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 13 participants
  Very low

Asthma Clinics (Intervention) vs controls

It is very uncertain whether asthma Clinics (Intervention) changes A&E visits Number of people experiencing one or more A&E visit compared with controls (very low certainty).

• Primary care based clinics for asthma 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 1.03 [0.21, 5.15]
  2 studies · 344 participants
  Very low

Asthma Clinics (Intervention) vs controls

Asthma Clinics (Intervention) showed no clear difference in hospital admissions Number of people experiencing one or more… compared with controls (low certainty).

• Primary care based clinics for asthma 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 0.32 [0.09, 1.21]
  2 studies · 344 participants
  Low

Asthma Clinics (Intervention) vs controls

• Primary care based clinics for asthma 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 263 participants
  GRADE not reported

Adverse event outcomes for dietary combined with physical activity interventions vs physical activity interventions

• Interventions for preventing obesity in children 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 3946 participants
  High

Adverse event outcomes for dietary combined with physical activity interventions vs physical activity interventions

• Interventions for preventing obesity in children 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 3946 participants
  High

A 10-minute film followed by the same 30-minute one-to-one hygienist instruction on sugar consumption and dental health, plus oral hygiene, fluoride and regular visits (a multi-intervention) vs No special instructions (control)

• One‐to‐one dietary interventions undertaken in a dental setting to change dietary behaviour 2012 · Cochrane All outcomes

  6 to 12 months
  Table 3, mean (SD) sugar consumption (1-5 scale): film-plus-instruction group 3.53 (1.27) at baseline to 3.06 (1.12) at follow-up (significant versus baseline); control 2.89 (0.99) to 2.88 (1.27). Results judged…
  1 study
  GRADE not reported

Summary of findings table ‐ Therapeutic exercise plus non‐surgical intervention vs non‐surgical treatment

• Therapeutic exercises for idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 34 participants
  Low

30 minutes of one-to-one instruction by a dental hygienist covering the relationship between sugar consumption and dental health, plus oral hygiene, fluoride and regular dental visits (a multi-intervention) vs No special instructions (control)

• One‐to‐one dietary interventions undertaken in a dental setting to change dietary behaviour 2012 · Cochrane All outcomes

  6 to 12 months
  Table 3, mean (SD) sugar consumption (1-5 scale): instruction group 3.41 (1.50) at baseline to 3.58 (1.07) at follow-up (significant versus baseline); control 2.89 (0.99) to 2.88 (1.27). The review judges the results…
  1 study
  GRADE not reported

Summary of findings: insulin detemir vs Insulin glargin (control)

Insulin detemir (intervention) showed no clear difference in percentage of participants having at least one severe hypoglycaemic… compared with insulin glargin (control) (low certainty).

• Insulin detemir versus insulin glargine for type 2 diabetes mellitus 2011 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.82 [0.51, 1.32]
  4 studies · 2252 participants
  Low

Summary of findings: insulin detemir vs Insulin glargin (control)

Insulin detemir (intervention) showed no clear difference in percentage of participants having at least one hypoglycaemic event compared with insulin glargin (control) (low certainty).

• Insulin detemir versus insulin glargine for type 2 diabetes mellitus 2011 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.98 [0.92, 1.05]
  4 studies · 2252 participants
  Low