Comparison 5: Mixed multimodal interventions showed no clear difference in repetition of SH at 12 months compared with treatment (low certainty).
Comparison 8: home‐based family intervention showed no clear difference in repetition of SH at six months compared with treatment (low certainty).
ANY FAMILY BASED INTERVENTIONS (>5 sessions) may leads to lower service utilisation: Hospital admission ‐ at about 12 months compared with STANDARD CARE (low certainty).
ANY FAMILY BASED INTERVENTIONS (>5 sessions) may leads to lower global state: Relapse ‐ at about 12 months compared with STANDARD CARE (low certainty).
ANY FAMILY BASED INTERVENTIONS (>5 sessions) may leads to lower compliance: Poor compliance with medication compared with STANDARD CARE (low certainty).
ANY FAMILY BASED INTERVENTIONS (>5 sessions) showed no clear difference in social functioning: Specific ‐ unemployed ‐ at about 1 year compared with STANDARD CARE (low certainty).
ANY FAMILY BASED INTERVENTIONS (>5 sessions) showed no clear difference in social functioning: Specific ‐ unable to live independently ‐ at… compared with STANDARD CARE (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether ANY FAMILY BASED INTERVENTIONS (>5 sessions) changes family outcome: Burden ‐ not improved/worse (objective burden… compared with STANDARD CARE (very low certainty).
Technology‐mediated psychoeducation + standard care intervention showed no clear difference in global state: not improved ‐ short‐term GAF compared with standard care intervention (low certainty).
Technology‐mediated psychoeducation + standard care intervention showed no clear difference in knowledge/insight: not improved ITAQ compared with standard care intervention (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether technology‐mediated psychoeducation + standard care intervention changes compliance/satisfaction: medication ‐ not compliant ‐ long‐term compared with standard care intervention (very low certainty).
Technology‐mediated psychoeducation + standard care intervention showed no clear difference in mental state: not improved ‐ short‐term BPRS compared with standard care intervention (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether blood pressure intervention/intensive blood pressure intervention changes visual acuity (loss of 3 lines or more) by 5 years compared with placebo/standard blood pressure intervention (very low certainty).