evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

238 questions · 259 findings · 27 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 65 · 25.1%GRADE not reported 21 · 8.1%Very low 67 · 25.9%Low 55 · 21.2%Moderate 45 · 17.4%High 6 · 2.3%

Patient‐reported health information interventions vs comparisons to improve professional performance

Patient satisfaction Number of satisfied patients · general patient population, "at risk" patient population and patient population with a specific condition or disease

It is very uncertain whether patient‐reported health information interventions changes patient satisfaction Number of satisfied patients (0‐3 months compared with comparisons to improve professional performance (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Multi‐component intervention vs control

Adverse events: number of people experiencing adverse events (all cause or COPD‐related), serious adverse events, mortality · COPD

Multi‐component intervention showed no clear difference in adverse events: number of people experiencing adverse events (all… compared with control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Multi‐component intervention vs control

Adherence to pharmacotherapy: number of people achieving adherence to medication · COPD

Multi‐component intervention may leads to higher adherence to pharmacotherapy: number of people achieving adherence… compared with control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Multi‐component intervention vs control

Exacerbations: number of people experiencing moderate or severe exacerbations · COPD

It is very uncertain whether multi‐component intervention changes exacerbations: number of people experiencing moderate or severe… compared with control (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use vs usual care

HIV incidence (observational studies) · low and high‐risk populations

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use showed no clear difference in HIV incidence (person/years) compared with standard care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use vs usual care

HIV prevalence · low and high‐risk populations

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use showed no clear difference in HIV prevalence compared with standard care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use vs usual care

Herpes Simplex Virus 2 (HSV‐2) incidence (person/years) · low and high‐risk populations

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use showed no clear difference in herpes Simplex Virus 2 (HSV‐2) incidence (person/years) compared with standard care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use vs usual care

HSV‐2 prevalence · low and high‐risk populations

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use showed no clear difference in HSV‐2 prevalence compared with standard care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use vs usual care

Two or more sexual partners in last year · low and high‐risk populations

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use showed no clear difference in two or more sexual partners in last year compared with standard care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use vs usual care

Use of birth control methods (condom use at last sex) · low and high‐risk populations

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use probably leads to higher use of condom during last sexual intercourse compared with standard care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use vs usual care

Knowledge: condom can prevent STIs · low and high‐risk populations

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use probably leads to higher knowledge: condom can prevent STIs compared with standard care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single component intervention vs control

Adherence to pharmacotherapy: number of people completing treatment · COPD

Single component intervention showed no clear difference in adherence to pharmacotherapy: number of people completing treatment compared with control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review