Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

637 questions · 714 findings · 96 reviews

No studies found 98 · 13.7%GRADE not reported 191 · 26.8%Very low 157 · 22%Low 161 · 22.5%Moderate 87 · 12.2%High 20 · 2.8%

Highest vs lowest selenium exposure

Breast cancer risk (14 studies) · Participants in trials with low risk of bias

Highest showed no clear difference in breast cancer risk No. of participants: 802 (1 RCT) compared with lowest selenium exposure (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Highest vs lowest selenium exposure

Bladder cancer risk No. of participants: 19,009 (2 RCTs) · Participants in trials with low risk of bias

Highest showed no clear difference in bladder cancer risk No. of participants: 19,009 (2 RCTs) compared with lowest selenium exposure (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Highest vs lowest selenium exposure

Prostate cancer risk (13 studies) · Participants in trials with low risk of bias

Highest showed no clear difference in prostate cancer risk No. of participants: 18,942 (4 RCTs) compared with lowest selenium exposure (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Higher vs lower FiO2 or targets of arterial oxygenation

All‐cause mortality: range 1 mo to 1 y · adults admitted to the ICU

It is very uncertain whether higher changes all‐cause mortality: range 1 mo to 1 y compared with lower FiO2 or targets of arterial oxygenation (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Higher vs lower FiO2 or targets of arterial oxygenation

Proportion of participants with 1 or more serious adverse events according to International Conference on Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice (ICH‐GCP) · adults admitted to the ICU

It is very uncertain whether higher changes proportion of participants with ≥ 1 serious adverse events according… compared with lower FiO2 or targets of arterial oxygenation (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Higher vs lower FiO2 or targets of arterial oxygenation

Lung injury diagnosed after randomisation (composite outcome): range 4 d to 23 d · adults admitted to the ICU

It is very uncertain whether higher changes lung injury diagnosed after randomisation (composite outcome): range… compared with lower FiO2 or targets of arterial oxygenation (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Higher vs lower FiO2 or targets of arterial oxygenation

Myocardial infarction · adults admitted to the ICU

It is very uncertain whether higher changes myocardial infarction diagnosed after randomisation: range ≤ 90 d compared with lower FiO2 or targets of arterial oxygenation (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Higher vs lower FiO2 or targets of arterial oxygenation

Stroke · adults admitted to the ICU

It is very uncertain whether higher changes stroke diagnosed after randomisation: range 1 mo to 3 mo compared with lower FiO2 or targets of arterial oxygenation (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Higher vs lower FiO2 or targets of arterial oxygenation

Sepsis diagnosed after randomisation: range 28 d to 60 d · adults admitted to the ICU

It is very uncertain whether higher changes sepsis diagnosed after randomisation: range 28 d to 60 d compared with lower FiO2 or targets of arterial oxygenation (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

High vs low dose pegylated interferon alpha‐2a or alpha‐2b

PEG interferon alpha‐2a · patients on HD with HCV infection

High showed no clear difference in PEG interferon alpha‐2a compared with low dose pegylated interferon alpha‐2a or alpha‐2b (low certainty).

4 findings from 1 review
Show 1 more finding

High vs low dose pegylated interferon alpha‐2a or alpha‐2b

PEG interferon (alpha‐2b) · patients on HD with HCV infection

High showed no clear difference in PEG interferon alpha‐2b compared with low dose pegylated interferon alpha‐2a or alpha‐2b (low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review