Stroke · people with or without existing cardiovascular disease, men and women
It is very uncertain whether homocysteine‐lowering interventions (high dose) changes stroke compared with homocysteine‐lowering interventions (low dose) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Stroke · adults with or without existing CVD
It is very uncertain whether high changes stroke compared with low alpha‐linolenic acid omega‐3 fats (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Stroke · adults with or without existing CVD
High showed no clear difference in stroke compared with low long‐chain omega‐3 fats (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Acute ischaemic stroke · adults undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass
It is very uncertain whether high changes acute ischaemic stroke compared with low blood pressure target (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Stroke · adults admitted to the ICU
It is very uncertain whether higher changes stroke diagnosed after randomisation: range 1 mo to 3 mo compared with lower FiO2 or targets of arterial oxygenation (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Stroke · people with or without existing CVD, men and women
Higher polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) showed no clear difference in stroke compared with lower PUFA (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Stroke · older adults with primary hypertension
Higher BP target (< 150‐160/95‐105 mmHg) showed no clear difference in stroke compared with lower BP target (< 140/90 mmHg) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Stroke · Adults (general population)
Meta-analysis of observational studies (higher vs lower 25(OH)D) for Stroke: RR 0.61 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.75), statistically significant. Umbrella review outcome-level evidence grade: Suggestive.
1 finding from 1 review
Fatal or nonfatal stroke · adults with or without existing CVD
It is very uncertain whether higher changes stroke: fatal or non‐fatal Study duration range 24‐96 months Omega‐6… compared with lower omega‐6: primary outcomes (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Ischaemic stroke · Adults (general population)
Meta-analysis of observational studies (higher vs lower 25(OH)D) for Ischaemic stroke (Hazard ratio (cohort studies)): HR 0.66 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.80), statistically significant. Umbrella review outcome-level evidence grade: Suggestive.
2 findings from 1 review