Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 1 reviews · Wounds

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 3 · 100%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

G‐CSF + standard treatment vs usual care

improvement of infection clinical and microbiological assessment · patients with diabetic foot infection

G‐CSF + standard treatment may leads to higher improvement of infection clinical and microbiological assessment compared with usual treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Granulocyte‐colony stimulating factors as adjunctive therapy for diabetic foot infections 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.4 [1.06, 1.85]
4 studies · 140 participants
Low

G‐CSF + standard treatment vs usual care

Surgical intervention · patients with diabetic foot infection

G‐CSF + standard treatment may leads to lower need for surgery: Overall Surgical Interventions compared with usual treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Granulocyte‐colony stimulating factors as adjunctive therapy for diabetic foot infections 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.37 [0.2, 0.68]
5 studies · 167 participants
Low

G‐CSF + standard treatment vs usual care

Need for surgery: Amputation · patients with diabetic foot infection

G‐CSF + standard treatment may leads to lower need for surgery: Amputation compared with usual treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Granulocyte‐colony stimulating factors as adjunctive therapy for diabetic foot infections 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.41 [0.18, 0.95]
5 studies · 167 participants
Low