Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

6 questions · 9 findings · 3 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 2 · 22.2%Very low 6 · 66.7%Low 1 · 11.1%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) vs supplemental oxygen

Treatment failure (death or use of additional ventilatory support) · preterm infants with respiratory distress for initial respiratory support

It is very uncertain whether CPAP changes treatment failure (death or use of additional ventilatory support) compared with supplemental oxygen (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for respiratory distress in preterm infants 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.64 [0.5, 0.82]
5 studies · 322 participants
Very low

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) vs nasal ventilation (NIPPV or NHFV)

Duration of tachypnea, defined as hours with respiratory rate greater than 60 breaths per minute · patients with the management of transient tachypnea of the newborn

2 findings from 1 review

Non‐invasive respiratory support for the management of transient tachypnea of the newborn 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 40 participants
Very low
Non‐invasive respiratory support for the management of transient tachypnea of the newborn 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 40 participants
Very low

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) vs supportive treatment

Change in respiratory rate at 20 minutes · children with acute bronchiolitis

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) showed no clear difference in mean change in respiratory rate (breaths/min) compared with supportive treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for acute bronchiolitis in children 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 91 participants
Low

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) vs nasal ventilation (NIPPV or NHFV)

Length of hospital stay · patients with the management of transient tachypnea of the newborn

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐invasive respiratory support for the management of transient tachypnea of the newborn 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 40 participants
Very low

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) vs nasal ventilation (NIPPV or NHFV)

Need for mechanical ventilation · patients with the management of transient tachypnea of the newborn

It is very uncertain whether CPAP changes need for mechanical ventilation ‒NIPPV versus CPAP compared with nasal ventilation (NIPPV or NHFV) (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Non‐invasive respiratory support for the management of transient tachypnea of the newborn 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 4 [0.49, 32.72]
1 study · 40 participants
Very low
Non‐invasive respiratory support for the management of transient tachypnea of the newborn 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 40 participants
GRADE not reported

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) vs nasal ventilation (NIPPV or NHFV)

Pneumothorax · patients with the management of transient tachypnea of the newborn

It is very uncertain whether CPAP changes pneumothorax ‒NIPPV versus CPAP compared with nasal ventilation (NIPPV or NHFV) (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Non‐invasive respiratory support for the management of transient tachypnea of the newborn 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1 [0.07, 14.9]
1 study · 40 participants
Very low
Non‐invasive respiratory support for the management of transient tachypnea of the newborn 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 40 participants
GRADE not reported