Cochrane · systematic review · CD013231
Non‐invasive respiratory support for the management of transient tachypnea of the newborn
Moresco, L, Romantsik, O, Calevo, MG, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2020 · Cochrane Library
NeonatalAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
11
current version
GRADE rated
9
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 2 · 18.2%Very low 9 · 81.8%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Non‐invasive respiratory support versus supplemental oxygen or no treatment for the management of transient tachypnea of the newborn
Population: patients with the management of transient tachypnea of the newborn
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Need for mechanical ventilation Non‐invasive respiratory support vs supplemental oxygen or no treatment | RR 0.3 [0.01, 6.99] | 1 study · 64 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias |
All‐cause mortality Non‐invasive respiratory support vs supplemental oxygen or no treatment | RR 0.3 [0.01, 6.99] | 1 study · 64 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Duration of hospital stay Non‐invasive respiratory support vs supplemental oxygen or no treatment | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 64 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Duration of tachypnea, defined as hours with respiratory rate greater than 60 breaths per minute Non‐invasive respiratory support vs supplemental oxygen or no treatment | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 64 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias |
CPAP versus nasal ventilation (NIPPV or NHFV) for the management of transient tachypnea of the newborn
Population: patients with the management of transient tachypnea of the newborn
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Need for mechanical ventilation ‒NIPPV versus CPAP CPAP vs nasal ventilation (NIPPV or NHFV) | RR 4 [0.49, 32.72] | 1 study · 40 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Need for mechanical ventilation ‒NHFV versus CPAP CPAP vs nasal ventilation (NIPPV or NHFV) | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 40 participants | Ungraded |
Pneumothorax ‒NIPPV versus CPAP CPAP vs nasal ventilation (NIPPV or NHFV) | RR 1 [0.07, 14.9] | 1 study · 40 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Pneumothorax ‒NHFV versus CPAP CPAP vs nasal ventilation (NIPPV or NHFV) | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 40 participants | Ungraded |
Duration of tachypnea, defined as hours with respiratory rate greater than 60 breaths per minute ‒NIPPV versus CPAP CPAP vs nasal ventilation (NIPPV or NHFV) | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 40 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Duration of tachypnea, defined as hours with respiratory rate greater than 60 breaths per minute ‒NHFV versus CPAP CPAP vs nasal ventilation (NIPPV or NHFV) | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 40 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness, publication bias |
Duration of hospital stay ‒NIPPV versus CPAP CPAP vs nasal ventilation (NIPPV or NHFV) | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 40 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias |