Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

12 questions · 15 findings · 2 reviews

No studies found 3 · 20%GRADE not reported 2 · 13.3%Very low 6 · 40%Low 4 · 26.7%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) vs nasal ventilation (NIPPV or NHFV)

Need for mechanical ventilation · patients with the management of transient tachypnea of the newborn

It is very uncertain whether CPAP changes need for mechanical ventilation ‒NIPPV versus CPAP compared with nasal ventilation (NIPPV or NHFV) (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) vs nasal ventilation (NIPPV or NHFV)

Duration of tachypnea, defined as hours with respiratory rate greater than 60 breaths per minute · patients with the management of transient tachypnea of the newborn
2 findings from 1 review

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) vs nasal ventilation (NIPPV or NHFV)

Pneumothorax · patients with the management of transient tachypnea of the newborn

It is very uncertain whether CPAP changes pneumothorax ‒NIPPV versus CPAP compared with nasal ventilation (NIPPV or NHFV) (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) plus best supportive care vs best supportive care

Cardiovascular mortality

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) plus best supportive care showed no clear difference in cardiovascular mortality ‐ after 24 months Number of participants:… compared with best supportive care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) plus best supportive care vs best supportive care

All‐cause mortality ‐ after 24 months Number of participants: 287(2 RCTs)

It is very uncertain whether continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) plus best supportive care changes all‐cause mortality ‐ after 24 months Number of participants: 287(2… compared with best supportive care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) plus best supportive care vs best supportive care

Time to life‐saving cardiovascular intervention

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) plus best supportive care may leads to lower time to life‐saving cardiovascular intervention ( compared with best supportive care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review