Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

18 questions · 20 findings · 3 reviews · Vascular

No studies found 1 · 5%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 5 · 25%Low 14 · 70%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Angioplasty vs primary stenting

Improvement in the stage of PAD according to Rutherford's criteria (one year) · patients with symptomatic Iliac artery lesions

Angioplasty showed no clear difference in improvement in the stage of PAD according to Rutherford's criteria… compared with primary stenting (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Angioplasty vs primary stenting

Resolution of symptoms and signs (one year) · patients with symptomatic Iliac artery lesions

Angioplasty showed no clear difference in resolution of symptoms and signs (one year) compared with primary stenting (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Drug‐eluting balloon angioplasty at 6 months vs uncoated balloon angioplasty at 6 months

Target lesion revascularization · patients with in‐stent restenosis of the femoropopliteal arteries

It is very uncertain whether drug‐eluting balloon angioplasty at 6 months changes target lesion revascularization (TLR) compared with uncoated balloon angioplasty at 6 months (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Drug‐eluting balloon angioplasty at 6 months vs uncoated balloon angioplasty at 6 months

Binary restenosis · patients with in‐stent restenosis of the femoropopliteal arteries

It is very uncertain whether drug‐eluting balloon angioplasty at 6 months changes binary restenosis compared with uncoated balloon angioplasty at 6 months (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Drug‐eluting balloon angioplasty at 6 months vs uncoated balloon angioplasty at 6 months

Death · patients with in‐stent restenosis of the femoropopliteal arteries

It is very uncertain whether drug‐eluting balloon angioplasty at 6 months changes death compared with uncoated balloon angioplasty at 6 months (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Drug‐eluting balloon angioplasty at 6 months vs uncoated balloon angioplasty at 6 months

Improvement ≥ 1 Rutherford category · patients with in‐stent restenosis of the femoropopliteal arteries

It is very uncertain whether drug‐eluting balloon angioplasty at 6 months changes improvement ≥ 1 Rutherford category compared with uncoated balloon angioplasty at 6 months (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Subintimal angioplasty with stenting vs remote endarterectomy

Clinical improvement: Rutherford classification improvement Rutherford classification · 95 people with Rutherford 3 to 5 TASC‐II D lesions

Subintimal angioplasty with stenting showed no clear difference in clinical improvement: Rutherford classification improvement… compared with remote endarterectomy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Subintimal angioplasty with stenting vs remote endarterectomy

Clinical improvement: ABI improvement Significant postexercise ABI improvement · 95 people with Rutherford 3 to 5 TASC‐II D lesions

Subintimal angioplasty with stenting showed no clear difference in clinical improvement: ABI improvement Significant postexercise ABI… compared with remote endarterectomy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Subintimal angioplasty with stenting vs remote endarterectomy

months' patency rate · 95 people with Rutherford 3 to 5 TASC‐II D lesions

Subintimal angioplasty with stenting showed no clear difference in months' patency rate compared with remote endarterectomy (low certainty).

3 findings from 1 review