Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

16 questions in 4 reviews · Esthetic dentistry

current versions
No studies 16 · 100%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Er:YAG laser (erbium-doped:yttrium-aluminum-garnet) vs Placebo (placebo laser or placebo agent) or no treatment
Outcome NR · Patients aged above 12 years with self-reported tooth hypersensitivity confirmed on clinical evaluation
Laser therapy for dentinal hypersensitivity (2021) · Cochrane
We did not find any eligible study to evaluate erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) or carbon dioxide (CO2) laser compared with placebo/no treatment.0 studiesNo studies
CO2 laser (carbon dioxide) vs Placebo (placebo laser or placebo agent) or no treatment
Outcome NR · Patients aged above 12 years with self-reported tooth hypersensitivity confirmed on clinical evaluation
Laser therapy for dentinal hypersensitivity (2021) · Cochrane
We did not find any eligible study to evaluate erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) or carbon dioxide (CO2) laser compared with placebo/no treatment.0 studiesNo studies
In-office laser therapy (all types combined) vs Placebo (placebo laser or placebo agent) or no treatment
Patient-reported quality of life · Patients aged above 12 years with self-reported tooth hypersensitivity confirmed on clinical evaluation
Laser therapy for dentinal hypersensitivity (2021) · Cochrane
Outcome not measured in any of the included studies0 studiesNo studies
HP gel in tray vs Placebo
Adverse effects · Adults (>=18 years) undergoing home-based bleaching (including tetracycline- and smoking-stained teeth, any baseline…
Home‐based chemically‐induced whitening (bleaching) of teeth in adults (2018) · Cochrane
Not reportedNRNo studies
HP mouthwash vs Placebo
Adverse effects · Adults (>=18 years) undergoing home-based bleaching (including tetracycline- and smoking-stained teeth, any baseline…
Home‐based chemically‐induced whitening (bleaching) of teeth in adults (2018) · Cochrane
Not reportedNRNo studies
CP paint-on gel vs Placebo
Adverse effects · Adults (>=18 years) undergoing home-based bleaching (including tetracycline- and smoking-stained teeth, any baseline…
Home‐based chemically‐induced whitening (bleaching) of teeth in adults (2018) · Cochrane
Not reportedNRNo studies
SHMP chewing gum vs Placebo
Adverse effects · Adults (>=18 years) undergoing home-based bleaching (including tetracycline- and smoking-stained teeth, any baseline…
Home‐based chemically‐induced whitening (bleaching) of teeth in adults (2018) · Cochrane
Not reportedNRNo studies
CP paint-on gel vs HP paint-on gel
Adverse effects · Adults (>=18 years) undergoing home-based bleaching (including tetracycline- and smoking-stained teeth, any baseline…
Home‐based chemically‐induced whitening (bleaching) of teeth in adults (2018) · Cochrane
Not reportedNRNo studies
CP paint-on gel vs HP strips
Adverse effects · Adults (>=18 years) undergoing home-based bleaching (including tetracycline- and smoking-stained teeth, any baseline…
Home‐based chemically‐induced whitening (bleaching) of teeth in adults (2018) · Cochrane
Not reportedNRNo studies
STPP chewing gum vs Placebo
Adverse effects · Adults (>=18 years) undergoing home-based bleaching (including tetracycline- and smoking-stained teeth, any baseline…
Home‐based chemically‐induced whitening (bleaching) of teeth in adults (2018) · Cochrane
Not reportedNRNo studies
A permanent restorative material or technique (e.g. amalgam; glass ionomer (type I-IV); composite resin (macrofilled, microfilled, hybrid, nanofilled); resin-modified glass ionomer (compomer, giomer); cement/cermet; stainless steel or nickel-chrome crown; pre-fabricated resin/porcelain veneer facing; microabrasion) vs A different permanent restorative material or technique
Outcome NR · Children and adolescents under 18 years with amelogenesis imperfecta requiring restorative care of anterior teeth,…
Interventions for the restorative care of amelogenesis imperfecta in children and adolescents (2013) · Cochrane
Main results: No studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. Effects of interventions: No studies met the inclusion criteria.0 studiesNo studies
A permanent restorative material or technique (e.g. amalgam; glass ionomer (type I-IV); composite resin (macrofilled, microfilled, hybrid, nanofilled); resin-modified glass ionomer (compomer, giomer); cement/cermet; stainless steel or nickel-chrome crown; pre-fabricated resin/porcelain veneer facing; microabrasion) vs A different permanent restorative material or technique
Outcome NR · Children and adolescents under 18 years with amelogenesis imperfecta requiring restorative care of posterior teeth,…
Interventions for the restorative care of amelogenesis imperfecta in children and adolescents (2013) · Cochrane
Main results: No studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. Effects of interventions: No studies met the inclusion criteria.0 studiesNo studies
Direct resin composite veneer vs Indirect resin composite veneer
Adverse reactions · Patients with permanent anterior teeth with intrinsic staining suitable for laminate veneer restorations
Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic dental stains (2004) · Cochrane
Planned outcome; no adverse-reaction data were reported by the included trial.0 studiesNo studies
Direct resin composite veneer vs Indirect resin composite veneer
Pain following treatment · Patients with permanent anterior teeth with intrinsic staining suitable for laminate veneer restorations
Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic dental stains (2004) · Cochrane
Planned outcome; pain following treatment was not reported by the included trial (earlier trial publications reported treatment times, not pain).0 studiesNo studies
Direct resin composite veneer vs Indirect resin composite veneer
Cost of treatment · Patients with permanent anterior teeth with intrinsic staining suitable for laminate veneer restorations
Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic dental stains (2004) · Cochrane
Planned outcome; cost of treatment was not reported by the included trial.0 studiesNo studies
Direct resin composite veneer vs Indirect resin composite veneer
Colour match (aesthetic achievement) · Patients with permanent anterior teeth with intrinsic staining suitable for laminate veneer restorations
Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic dental stains (2004) · Cochrane
Planned outcome; colour match was not reported by the single included trial (Meijering 1998).0 studiesNo studies