Cochrane · intervention · CD009434

Laser therapy for dentinal hypersensitivity

Mahdian, M, Behboodi, S, Ogata, Y, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2021 · Cochrane Library

Oral HealthEsthetic dentistry2 versionsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
Full textEvery question was extracted from the full review (methods and results), not only its Summary of Findings table.
Questions
35
current version
GRADE rated
8
No studies
3
Included studies
23
as reported
No studies 3 · 8.6%Ungraded 24 · 68.6%Very low 4 · 11.4%Low 4 · 11.4%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationPatients aged above 12 years presenting with self-reported tooth hypersensitivity confirmed in clinical evaluation936 participants (2296 teeth) with dentinal hypersensitivity across 23 RCTs; age range 12 to 69 years; most studies showed higher female preponderance
InterventionAny type of in-office laser with different radiation parameters: Nd:YAG; Er:YAG; diode of different wavelengths (visible red 630-700 nm, near infrared 700-850 nm, near infrared 2 850-980 nm); Er,Cr:YSGG; CO2 laserDiode laser at varying wavelengths 655-980 nm (n=20); Er,Cr:YSGG laser (n=4); Nd:YAG laser (n=2)
ComparisonPlacebo lasers; Placebo agents; No treatmentPlacebo laser (n=18); Placebo agents e.g. toothpaste/distilled water/saline (n=5); No treatment (n=2)
OutcomesChanges in intensity of pain (VAS) tested through air blast stimulus at short (0 to 24 hours), medium (24 hours to 2 months) and long term (more than 2 months); changes in intensity of pain (VAS) tested through tactile stimulus at short, medium and long term; adverse outcomes; patient-reported quality of lifeChanges in intensity of pain via air blast stimuli (n=22); changes in intensity of pain via tactile stimuli (n=12); adverse events (n=15); patient-reported quality of life (n=0)
Study designsRandomised controlled trials (RCTs), including split-mouth designRCT (n=23; 13 split-mouth, 10 parallel-group)
TimingShort term (0 to 24 hours); medium term (24 hours to 2 months); long term (more than 2 months)Short term (0 to 24 hours); medium term (24 hours to 2 months); long term (more than 2 months); follow-up up to 6 months

Search date: 2020-10. Databases: Cochrane Oral Health's Trials Register; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); MEDLINE Ovid; Embase Ovid; CINAHL EBSCO; LILACS BIREME Virtual Health Library; ISI Web of Science; ZETOC; OpenGrey; ClinicalTrials.gov; WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform

Questions and results

Show all 2 versions

In-office laser therapy (all types combined) vs Placebo (placebo laser or placebo agent) or no treatment

Population: Patients aged above 12 years with self-reported tooth hypersensitivity confirmed on clinical evaluation
9 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Changes in intensity of pain (VAS 0 to 10) tested through air blast stimuli
Short term (0 to 24 hours)
MD -2.24 [-3.55, -0.93]
-2.24 [-3.55, -0.93] VAS points (0 to 10)
13 studies · 978 participantsLow
Downgraded: inconsistency
Changes in intensity of pain (VAS 0 to 10) tested through tactile stimuli
Medium term (24 hours to 2 months)
MD -1.73 [-3.17, -0.30]
-1.73 [-3.17, -0.30] VAS points (0 to 10)
9 studies · 591 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Changes in intensity of pain (VAS 0 to 10) tested through air blast stimuli
Long term (more than 2 months)
MD -2.60 [-4.47, -0.73]
-2.60 [-4.47, -0.73] VAS points (0 to 10)
5 studies · 564 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
Changes in intensity of pain (VAS 0 to 10) tested through tactile stimuli
Long term (more than 2 months)
MD -3.52 [-10.37, 3.33]
-3.52 [-10.37, 3.33] VAS points (0 to 10)
2 studies · 184 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Changes in intensity of pain (VAS 0 to 10) tested through air blast stimuli
Medium term (24 hours to 2 months)
MD -2.46 [-3.57, -1.35]
-2.46 [-3.57, -1.35] VAS points (0 to 10)
11 studies · 1007 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Adverse events
Air blast stimuli studies (SoF 1)
No adverse event was noted in the experimental and control groups11 studies · 954 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Changes in intensity of pain (VAS 0 to 10) tested through tactile stimuli
Short term (0 to 24 hours)
MD -0.67 [-1.31, -0.03]
-0.67 [-1.31, -0.03] VAS points (0 to 10)
8 studies · 506 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Patient-reported quality of life
Outcome not measured in any of the included studies0 studiesNo studies
Adverse events
Tactile stimuli studies (SoF 2)
No adverse event was noted in the experimental and control groups5 studies · 386 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Er,Cr:YSGG laser (erbium,chromium:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet) vs Placebo (placebo laser or placebo agent) or no treatment

Population: Patients aged above 12 years with self-reported tooth hypersensitivity confirmed on clinical evaluation
4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Changes in intensity of pain (VAS 0 to 10) tested through air blast stimuli
Long term (more than 2 months)
MD -5.19 [-5.50, -4.89]2 studiesUngraded
Changes in intensity of pain (VAS 0 to 10) tested through air blast stimuli
Short term (0 to 24 hours)
MD -4.61 [-4.83, -4.39]3 studiesUngraded
Changes in intensity of pain (VAS 0 to 10) tested through tactile stimuli
Medium term (24 hours to 2 months)
MD 0.38 [-0.13, 0.89]1 studyUngraded
Changes in intensity of pain (VAS 0 to 10) tested through air blast stimuli
Medium term (24 hours to 2 months)
MD -4.90 [-5.21, -4.59]2 studiesUngraded

Nd:YAG laser (neodymium-doped:yttrium-aluminum-garnet) vs Placebo (placebo laser or placebo agent) or no treatment

Population: Patients aged above 12 years with self-reported tooth hypersensitivity confirmed on clinical evaluation
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Changes in intensity of pain (VAS 0 to 10) tested through tactile stimuli
Short term (0 to 24 hours)
MD -0.25 [-0.91, 0.41]1 studyUngraded
Changes in intensity of pain (VAS 0 to 10) tested through air blast stimuli
Long term (more than 2 months)
MD 0.18 [-0.84, 1.20]1 studyUngraded
Changes in intensity of pain (VAS 0 to 10) tested through air blast stimuli
Short term (0 to 24 hours)
MD 0.22 [-0.55, 0.99]2 studiesUngraded
Changes in intensity of pain (VAS 0 to 10) tested through tactile stimuli
Medium term (24 hours to 2 months)
MD -1.06 [-2.15, 0.03]2 studiesUngraded
Changes in intensity of pain (VAS 0 to 10) tested through air blast stimuli
Medium term (24 hours to 2 months)
MD 0.42 [-0.97, 1.82]2 studiesUngraded

Diode laser, visible red (630 nm to 700 nm) vs Placebo (placebo laser or placebo agent) or no treatment

Population: Patients aged above 12 years with self-reported tooth hypersensitivity confirmed on clinical evaluation
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Changes in intensity of pain (VAS 0 to 10) tested through air blast stimuli
Short term (0 to 24 hours)
MD -1.95 [-3.14, -0.76]4 studiesUngraded
Changes in intensity of pain (VAS 0 to 10) tested through air blast stimuli
Long term (more than 2 months)
MD 0.81 [-0.78, 2.40]1 studyUngraded
Changes in intensity of pain (VAS 0 to 10) tested through tactile stimuli
Medium term (24 hours to 2 months)
MD -2.95 [-5.14, -0.75]4 studiesUngraded
Changes in intensity of pain (VAS 0 to 10) tested through tactile stimuli
Long term (more than 2 months)
MD -4.67 [-5.38, -3.96]2 studiesUngraded
Changes in intensity of pain (VAS 0 to 10) tested through tactile stimuli
Short term (0 to 24 hours)
MD -0.81 [-1.16, -0.45]4 studiesUngraded
Changes in intensity of pain (VAS 0 to 10) tested through air blast stimuli
Medium term (24 hours to 2 months)
MD -1.45 [-4.35, 1.44]4 studiesUngraded

Diode laser, near infrared (700 nm to 850 nm) vs Placebo (placebo laser or placebo agent) or no treatment

Population: Patients aged above 12 years with self-reported tooth hypersensitivity confirmed on clinical evaluation
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Changes in intensity of pain (VAS 0 to 10) tested through air blast stimuli
Medium term (24 hours to 2 months)
MD -3.22 [-4.88, -1.56]4 studiesUngraded
Changes in intensity of pain (VAS 0 to 10) tested through air blast stimuli
Short term (0 to 24 hours)
MD -2.62 [-5.61, 0.38]4 studiesUngraded
Changes in intensity of pain (VAS 0 to 10) tested through tactile stimuli
Medium term (24 hours to 2 months)
MD -0.68 [-3.57, 2.21]2 studiesUngraded
Changes in intensity of pain (VAS 0 to 10) tested through tactile stimuli
Short term (0 to 24 hours)
MD 0.27 [-0.60, 1.14]2 studiesUngraded
Changes in intensity of pain (VAS 0 to 10) tested through air blast stimuli
Long term (more than 2 months)
MD -3.83 [-6.90, -0.77]2 studiesUngraded

Diode laser, near infrared (850 nm to 980 nm) vs Placebo (placebo laser or placebo agent) or no treatment

Population: Patients aged above 12 years with self-reported tooth hypersensitivity confirmed on clinical evaluation
4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Changes in intensity of pain (VAS 0 to 10) tested through air blast stimuli
Short term (0 to 24 hours)
MD -1.90 [-2.49, -1.31]1 studyUngraded
Changes in intensity of pain (VAS 0 to 10) tested through tactile stimuli
Medium term (24 hours to 2 months)
MD -1.83 [-2.36, -1.30]1 studyUngraded
Changes in intensity of pain (VAS 0 to 10) tested through air blast stimuli
Medium term (24 hours to 2 months)
MD -2.30 [-2.86, -1.74]1 studyUngraded
Changes in intensity of pain (VAS 0 to 10) tested through tactile stimuli
Short term (0 to 24 hours)
MD -2.17 [-2.80, -1.54]1 studyUngraded

Er:YAG laser (erbium-doped:yttrium-aluminum-garnet) vs Placebo (placebo laser or placebo agent) or no treatment

Population: Patients aged above 12 years with self-reported tooth hypersensitivity confirmed on clinical evaluation
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcome NR
We did not find any eligible study to evaluate erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) or carbon dioxide (CO2) laser compared with placebo/no treatment.0 studiesNo studies

CO2 laser (carbon dioxide) vs Placebo (placebo laser or placebo agent) or no treatment

Population: Patients aged above 12 years with self-reported tooth hypersensitivity confirmed on clinical evaluation
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcome NR
We did not find any eligible study to evaluate erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) or carbon dioxide (CO2) laser compared with placebo/no treatment.0 studiesNo studies