Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

542 questions in 42 reviews · Skin

current versions
No studies 542 · 100%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Ustekinumab vs placebo
Proportion of participants with adverse effects serious or severe enough to have caused withdrawal ‐ not reported · chronic palmoplantar pustulosis
Interventions for chronic palmoplantar pustulosis (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Ustekinumab vs placebo
Proportion of participants with at least 50% improvement in their quality of life ‐ not reported · chronic palmoplantar pustulosis
Interventions for chronic palmoplantar pustulosis (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Ustekinumab vs placebo
Proportion of participants without relapse in the long term ‐ not reported · chronic palmoplantar pustulosis
Interventions for chronic palmoplantar pustulosis (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Ustekinumab vs placebo
Proportion of participants with adverse effects ‐ not reported · chronic palmoplantar pustulosis
Interventions for chronic palmoplantar pustulosis (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% cream with occlusive dressing vs clobetasol cream 0.05% cream
Ease of compliance to an intervention or a treatment ‐ not reported · for chronic palmoplantar pustulosis
Interventions for chronic palmoplantar pustulosis (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Ustekinumab vs placebo
Ease of compliance to an intervention or a treatment ‐ not reported · chronic palmoplantar pustulosis
Interventions for chronic palmoplantar pustulosis (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Guselkumab vs placebo
Proportion of participants with at least 50% improvement in their quality of life ‐ not reported · chronic palmoplantar pustulosis
Interventions for chronic palmoplantar pustulosis (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Guselkumab vs placebo
Proportion of participants without relapse in the long term ‐ not reported · chronic palmoplantar pustulosis
Interventions for chronic palmoplantar pustulosis (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Guselkumab vs placebo
Proportion of participants with adverse effects ‐ not reported · chronic palmoplantar pustulosis
Interventions for chronic palmoplantar pustulosis (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Guselkumab vs placebo
Ease of compliance to an intervention or a treatment ‐ not reported · chronic palmoplantar pustulosis
Interventions for chronic palmoplantar pustulosis (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Secukinumab vs placebo
Proportion of participants cleared or almost clear ‐ not reported · chronic palmoplantar pustulosis
Interventions for chronic palmoplantar pustulosis (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Secukinumab vs placebo
Proportion of participants with at least 50% improvement in their quality of life ‐ not reported · chronic palmoplantar pustulosis
Interventions for chronic palmoplantar pustulosis (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Secukinumab vs placebo
Proportion of participants without relapse in the long term ‐ not reported · chronic palmoplantar pustulosis
Interventions for chronic palmoplantar pustulosis (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Secukinumab vs placebo
Proportion of participants with adverse effects in the short term ‐ not reported · chronic palmoplantar pustulosis
Interventions for chronic palmoplantar pustulosis (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Secukinumab vs placebo
Ease of compliance to an intervention or a treatment ‐ not reported · chronic palmoplantar pustulosis
Interventions for chronic palmoplantar pustulosis (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Topical vitamin D derivative vs placebo
Proportion of participants with adverse effects serious or severe enough to have caused withdrawal ‐ not reported · chronic palmoplantar pustulosis
Interventions for chronic palmoplantar pustulosis (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Tavaborole 5% solution vs vehicle
Clinical Cure ‐ not measured · People with fungal infections of the toenails
Topical and device‐based treatments for fungal infections of the toenails (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
P‐3051 (ciclopirox 8% hydrolacquer) vs comparators
Clinical cure ‐ not measured · People with fungal infections of the toenails
Topical and device‐based treatments for fungal infections of the toenails (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
1064‐nm Nd:YAG laser vs no treatment or sham treatment
Complete cure ‐ not measured · People with fungal infections of the toenails
Topical and device‐based treatments for fungal infections of the toenails (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
1064‐nm Nd:YAG laser vs no treatment or sham treatment
Clinical cure ‐ not measured · People with fungal infections of the toenails
Topical and device‐based treatments for fungal infections of the toenails (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Luliconazole 5% solution vs vehicle
Clinical Cure ‐ not measured · People with fungal infections of the toenails
Topical and device‐based treatments for fungal infections of the toenails (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Ciclopirox 8% lacquer vs vehicle
Clinical cure ‐ not measured · people with fungal infections of the toenails
Topical and device‐based treatments for fungal infections of the toenails (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Serlopitant 1 mg vs placebo
Depression · chronic pruritus of unknown origin
Interventions for chronic pruritus of unknown origin (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Serlopitant 1 mg vs placebo
Patient satisfaction · chronic pruritus of unknown origin
Interventions for chronic pruritus of unknown origin (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Serlopitant 0.25 mg vs placebo
Depression · chronic pruritus of unknown origin
Interventions for chronic pruritus of unknown origin (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Serlopitant 0.25 mg vs placebo
Patient satisfaction · chronic pruritus of unknown origin
Interventions for chronic pruritus of unknown origin (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Serlopitant 5 mg vs placebo
Depression · chronic pruritus of unknown origin
Interventions for chronic pruritus of unknown origin (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Serlopitant 5 mg vs placebo
Patient satisfaction · chronic pruritus of unknown origin
Interventions for chronic pruritus of unknown origin (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Placebo · patients with moderate to severe eczema
Systemic treatments for eczema: a network meta‐analysis (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Placebo · patients with moderate to severe eczema
Systemic treatments for eczema: a network meta‐analysis (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Placebo · patients with moderate to severe eczema
Systemic treatments for eczema: a network meta‐analysis (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Placebo · patients with moderate to severe eczema
Systemic treatments for eczema: a network meta‐analysis (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Placebo · patients with moderate to severe eczema
Systemic treatments for eczema: a network meta‐analysis (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Placebo · patients with moderate to severe eczema
Systemic treatments for eczema: a network meta‐analysis (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Bleach bath vs placebo or bath emollient
No of participants in whom S. aureus was isolated · children and adults with atopic dermatitis
Interventions to reduce Staphylococcus aureus in the management of eczema (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Corticosteroid creams/ointments: mometasone furoate cream 3 times/week vs 2 times/week
Secondary: investigator‐rated reduction in severity Not measured · people (all patch‐tested) with hand eczema > 6 months that had cleared upon daily treatment for a maximum of 9 weeks…
Interventions for hand eczema (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Irradiation with UV light: local narrow‐band UVB vs local PUVA
Primary: participant‐rated good/excellent control of symptoms Not measured · people with hand eczema unresponsive to clobetasol propionate
Interventions for hand eczema (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Topical calcineurin inhibitors: tacrolimus 0.1% ointment vs mometasone furoate ointment
Primary: investigator‐rated good/excellent control of symptoms ‐ Not measured · people with moderate to severe chronic relapsing dyshidrotic eczema on hands
Interventions for hand eczema (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Topical calcineurin inhibitors: tacrolimus 0.1% ointment vs mometasone furoate ointment
Primary: participant‐rated good/excellent control of symptoms ‐ Not measured · people with moderate to severe chronic relapsing dyshidrotic eczema on hands
Interventions for hand eczema (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Topical calcineurin inhibitors: tacrolimus 0.1% ointment vs vehicle
Primary: participant‐rated good/excellent control of symptoms Not measured · people with moderate to severe nickel sulphate‐induced allergic contact dermatitis based on clinical history (hand…
Interventions for hand eczema (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Topical calcineurin inhibitors: tacrolimus 0.1% ointment vs vehicle
Secondary: investigator‐rated reduction in severity ‐ Not measured · people with moderate to severe nickel sulphate‐induced allergic contact dermatitis based on clinical history (hand…
Interventions for hand eczema (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Oral retinoids: alitretinoin 30 mg vs placebo
Secondary: investigator‐rated reduction in severity in TLSSc and mTLSSd · people with moderate to severe chronic hand eczema
Interventions for hand eczema (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Corticosteroid creams/ointments: mometasone furoate cream 3 times/week vs 2 times/week
Primary: participant‐rated good/excellent control of symptoms Not measured · people (all patch‐tested) with hand eczema > 6 months that had cleared upon daily treatment for a maximum of 9 weeks…
Interventions for hand eczema (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Narrowband UVB phototherapy vs medium‐dose UVA‐1 phototherapy (50 J/cm²)
Secondary outcome: Improvement of disease damage ‐ not measured · children and adults with active morphea (circumscribed morphea, linear scleroderma (with trunk/limb variant and head…
Interventions for morphea (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Narrowband UVB phototherapy vs low‐dose UVA‐1 phototherapy (20 J/cm²)
Secondary outcome: Improvement of disease damage ‐ not measured · children and adults with active morphea (circumscribed morphea, linear scleroderma (with trunk/limb variant and head…
Interventions for morphea (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Medium‐dose UVA‐1 phototherapy (50 J/cm²) vs low‐dose UVA‐1 phototherapy (20 J/cm²)
Secondary outcome: Improvement of disease damage ‒ not measured · children and adults with active morphea (circumscribed morphea, linear scleroderma (with trunk/limb variant and head…
Interventions for morphea (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Clarithromycin vs placebo
The proportion of participants with good or excellent rash improvement within 2 weeks, as rated by the participant · pityriasis rosea
Interventions for pityriasis rosea (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Azithromycin vs placebo or vitamins
The proportion of participants with good or excellent rash improvement within 2 weeks, as rated by the participant · pityriasis rosea
Interventions for pityriasis rosea (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Acyclovir vs placebo, vitamins, or no treatment
The proportion of participants with good or excellent rash improvement within 2 weeks, as rated by the participant · pityriasis rosea
Interventions for pityriasis rosea (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Acyclovir vs placebo, vitamins, or no treatment
Reduction in itch score within 2 weeks, as rated by the participant · pityriasis rosea
Interventions for pityriasis rosea (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies