Cochrane · systematic review · CD003871

Interventions to reduce Staphylococcus aureus in the management of eczema

George, SMC, Karanovic, S, Harrison, DA, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2019 · Cochrane Library

SkinAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
21
current version
GRADE rated
20
No studies
1
Included studies
NR
No studies 1 · 4.8%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 9 · 42.9%Low 6 · 28.6%Moderate 5 · 23.8%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Topical steroid plus topical antibiotic compared with topical steroid for eczema

Population: children and adults with eczema
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Global outcome (good or excellent improvement in symptoms or signs, or both)
Topical steroid plus topical antibiotic vs topical steroid
RR 1.1 [1, 1.21]3 studies · 224 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Change from baseline in quality of life IDQoL ranges from 0 to 30 with higher values indicating more impaired quality of life
Topical steroid plus topical antibiotic vs topical steroid
no estimate extracted1 study · 42 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Adverse events requiring withdrawal from treatment
Topical steroid plus topical antibiotic vs topical steroid
RR 1.24 [0.21, 7.25]4 studies · 325 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Minor adverse events not requiring withdrawal from treatment
Topical steroid plus topical antibiotic vs topical steroid
RR 0.3 [0.12, 0.78]2 studies · 218 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Emergence of antibiotic‐resistant micro‐organisms
Topical steroid plus topical antibiotic vs topical steroid
no estimate extracted1 study · 65 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Global change in composite ratings scale EASI ranges from 0 to 72, objective SCORAD ranges from 0 to 83 and SCORAD ranges from 0 to 108, with higher values indicating greater severity.
Topical steroid plus topical antibiotic vs topical steroid
no estimate extracted4 studies · 256 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
No of participants in whom S. aureus was isolated
Topical steroid plus topical antibiotic vs topical steroid
RR 0.48 [0.27, 0.84]7 studies · 298 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency

Oral antibiotic compared with placebo for eczema

Population: children and adults with atopic dermatitis
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Global outcome (good or excellent improvement in symptoms or signs, or both)
Oral antibiotic vs placebo
RR 0.8 [0.18, 3.5]2 studies · 75 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Change from baseline in quality of life IDQoL ranges from 0 to 30 with higher values indicating more impaired quality of life.
Oral antibiotic vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 45 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Adverse events requiring withdrawal from treatment
Oral antibiotic vs placebo
no estimate extracted4 studies · 199 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Minor adverse events not requiring withdrawal from treatment
Oral antibiotic vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 68 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Emergence of antibiotic‐resistant micro‐organisms
Oral antibiotic vs placebo
no estimate extracted2 studies · 98 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Global change in composite ratings scale EASI ranges from 0 to 72 with higher values indicating greater severity.
Oral antibiotic vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 68 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
No of participants in whom S. aureus was isolated
Oral antibiotic vs placebo
RR 0.76 [0.46, 1.26]3 studies · 144 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Bleach bath compared with placebo or bath emollient for eczema

Population: children and adults with atopic dermatitis
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Global outcome (good or excellent improvement in symptoms or signs, or both)
Bleach bath vs placebo or bath emollient
RR 0.78 [0.37, 1.63]1 study · 36 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Change from baseline in quality of life CDLQI ranges from 0 to 30 with higher values indicating more impaired quality of life.
Bleach bath vs placebo or bath emollient
no estimate extracted1 study · 80 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Adverse events requiring withdrawal from treatment
Bleach bath vs placebo or bath emollient
no estimate extracted1 study · 42 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Minor adverse events not requiring withdrawal from treatment
Bleach bath vs placebo or bath emollient
RR 1 [0.35, 2.87]1 study · 36 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Emergence of antibiotic‐resistant micro‐organisms
Bleach bath vs placebo or bath emollient
no estimate extracted1 study · 80 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Global change in composite ratings scale EASI ranges from 0 to 72 with higher values indicating greater severity.
Bleach bath vs placebo or bath emollient
no estimate extracted2 studies · 54 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
No of participants in whom S. aureus was isolated
Bleach bath vs placebo or bath emollient
no estimate extractedNRNo studies