Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

15,213 questions in 2,394 reviews

current versions
No studies 15,213 · 100%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Aciclovir (oral or intravenous) for treatment vs Placebo
Amount of analgesia · Patients being treated for cancer with established oral HSV infection (bone marrow transplant recipients /…
Interventions for the prevention and treatment of herpes simplex virus in patients being treated for cancer (2009) · Cochrane
For the treatment comparison (aciclovir versus placebo), no data were available for recurrence of lesions, amount of analgesia, days of stay in hospital, cost of oral care or patient quality of life.0 studiesNo studies
Bioresorbable plates or screws (or both) vs Titanium plates or screws (used as lag screws) or both
Adverse effects (insufficient fixation; re-operation/revision; plate exposure; superficial or deep wound infection; sinus tract; wound dehiscence; giant cell/foreign body or inflammatory reaction; post-traumatic dystrophy) · Participants over 18 years of age with fractures of the facial skeleton including the mandible, maxilla, zygoma… · Up to 3 years postoperatively
Resorbable versus titanium plates for facial fractures (2009) · Cochrane
Planned adverse-effects outcome not assessed: none of the retrieved studies met the inclusion criteria, so no data were available for analysis. Verbatim (Effects of interventions): "Although 53 studies were retrieved…0 studiesNo studies
Any denture cleansing method (mechanical or chemical) vs Another method, sham/placebo, or no treatment
Adverse effects · Adults (over 18) wearing complete dentures (CD) or removable partial dentures (RPD)
Interventions for cleaning dentures in adults (2009) · Cochrane
Noticeable absence of reports about adverse effects; no included study assessed the extent of adverse effects (for example the aftertaste of sodium hypochlorite, or mechanical or chemical damage to denture materials)…0 studiesNo studies
Dental fillings (restorations) vs Dental extractions
Outcome NR · Children aged 12 years or younger with tooth decay involving at least one tooth in the primary dentition, symptomatic… · Minimum 6 months follow-up
Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition (2009) · Cochrane
"No studies were found that compared restorations versus extractions or no treatment as an intervention in children with caries in the primary dentition."NRNo studies
Horizontal bone augmentation (any technique) vs No augmentation
Outcome NR · Patients with horizontally resorbed maxillary sites needing single implants · At least to abutment connection (planned)
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: horizontal and vertical bone augmentation techniques for dental… (2009) · Cochrane
No trial evaluated whether horizontal bone augmentation is necessary (explicit gap)0 studiesNo studies
Arthrocentesis and lavage vs Arthroscopy
Temporomandibular joint tenderness · Adults with temporomandibular joint disorders (internal derangement; anterior disc displacement with or without…
Arthrocentesis and lavage for treating temporomandibular joint disorders (2009) · Cochrane
To date, no randomised controlled trial in this area reported temporomandibular joint tenderness.0 studiesNo studies
Arthrocentesis and lavage vs Arthroscopy
Quality of life · Adults with temporomandibular joint disorders (internal derangement; anterior disc displacement with or without…
Arthrocentesis and lavage for treating temporomandibular joint disorders (2009) · Cochrane
No data about quality of life were reported by the included trials.0 studiesNo studies
Arthrocentesis and lavage vs Arthroscopy
Deviation of the mandible · Adults with temporomandibular joint disorders (internal derangement; anterior disc displacement with or without…
Arthrocentesis and lavage for treating temporomandibular joint disorders (2009) · Cochrane
To date, no randomised controlled trial in this area reported deviation of the mandible.0 studiesNo studies
Prophylactic aciclovir (oral or intravenous) vs Placebo
Days stay in hospital · Patients being treated for cancer (predominantly haematological malignancies)
Interventions for the prevention and treatment of herpes simplex virus in patients being treated for cancer (2009) · Cochrane
For prevention or treatment, no trials reported on duration of hospital stay, amount of analgesia or patient quality of life.0 studiesNo studies
1-stage (non-submerged) implant placement vs 2-stage (submerged) implant placement
Patient preference including aesthetics (split-mouth studies only) · Any subject receiving osseointegrated dental implants · 6 to 12 months after loading
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: 1- versus 2-stage implant placement (2009) · Cochrane
Planned outcome (patient preference including aesthetics, only in split-mouth studies); no included trial reported it.0 studiesNo studies
Bioresorbable plates or screws (or both) vs Titanium plates or screws (used as lag screws) or both
Patient satisfaction (questionnaire) · Participants over 18 years of age with fractures of the facial skeleton including the mandible, maxilla, zygoma… · Up to 3 years postoperatively
Resorbable versus titanium plates for facial fractures (2009) · Cochrane
Planned secondary outcome not assessed: none of the retrieved studies met the inclusion criteria, so no data were available for analysis. Verbatim (Effects of interventions): "Although 53 studies were retrieved in our…0 studiesNo studies
Arthrocentesis and lavage vs Arthroscopy
Muscular tenderness · Adults with temporomandibular joint disorders (internal derangement; anterior disc displacement with or without…
Arthrocentesis and lavage for treating temporomandibular joint disorders (2009) · Cochrane
To date, no randomised controlled trial in this area reported muscular tenderness.0 studiesNo studies
Bioresorbable plates or screws (or both) vs Titanium plates or screws (used as lag screws) or both
Direct costs (plates, supporting equipment, hospital bed days, retreatment) · Participants over 18 years of age with fractures of the facial skeleton including the mandible, maxilla, zygoma… · Up to 3 years postoperatively
Resorbable versus titanium plates for facial fractures (2009) · Cochrane
Planned cost outcome not assessed: none of the retrieved studies met the inclusion criteria, so no data were available for analysis. Verbatim (Effects of interventions): "Although 53 studies were retrieved in our…0 studiesNo studies
Bioresorbable plates or screws (or both) vs Titanium plates or screws (used as lag screws) or both
Analgesic medication used (type, dose, frequency) · Participants over 18 years of age with fractures of the facial skeleton including the mandible, maxilla, zygoma… · Up to 3 years postoperatively
Resorbable versus titanium plates for facial fractures (2009) · Cochrane
Planned primary outcome not assessed: none of the retrieved studies met the inclusion criteria, so no data were available for analysis. Verbatim (Effects of interventions): "Although 53 studies were retrieved in our…0 studiesNo studies
Bioresorbable plates or screws (or both) vs Titanium plates or screws (used as lag screws) or both
Need for retreatment or replacement of fixation due to failure of the fixation · Participants over 18 years of age with fractures of the facial skeleton including the mandible, maxilla, zygoma… · Up to 3 years postoperatively
Resorbable versus titanium plates for facial fractures (2009) · Cochrane
Planned primary outcome not assessed: none of the retrieved studies met the inclusion criteria, so no data were available for analysis. Verbatim (Effects of interventions): "Although 53 studies were retrieved in our…0 studiesNo studies
Aciclovir (oral or intravenous) for treatment vs Placebo
Patient quality of life · Patients being treated for cancer with established oral HSV infection (bone marrow transplant recipients /…
Interventions for the prevention and treatment of herpes simplex virus in patients being treated for cancer (2009) · Cochrane
For the treatment comparison (aciclovir versus placebo), no data were available for recurrence of lesions, amount of analgesia, days of stay in hospital, cost of oral care or patient quality of life.0 studiesNo studies
Prophylactic aciclovir (oral or intravenous) vs Placebo
Recurrence of lesions · Patients being treated for cancer (predominantly haematological malignancies)
Interventions for the prevention and treatment of herpes simplex virus in patients being treated for cancer (2009) · Cochrane
Recurrence of lesions was a planned secondary outcome; no included trial reported data for this outcome in the prophylactic aciclovir versus placebo comparison.0 studiesNo studies
Primary surgical intervention (curettage, peripheral osteotomy, or resection) vs Primary non-surgical intervention (intralesional corticosteroids, subcutaneous calcitonin, interferon alpha, or imatinib)
Adverse events · Patients with a pathological diagnosis of central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) of the jaws
Interventions for central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) of the jaws (2009) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Summary of findings: 5 mg/day vs placebo
Benefits · People with rotator cuff disease
Topical glyceryl trinitrate for rotator cuff disease (2009) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings: 1.25 mg/day plus rehabilitation vs placebo plus rehabilitation
Function ‐ not measured · People with rotator cuff disease
Topical glyceryl trinitrate for rotator cuff disease (2009) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings: 1.25 mg/day plus rehabilitation vs placebo plus rehabilitation
Harms · People with rotator cuff disease
Topical glyceryl trinitrate for rotator cuff disease (2009) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings: 5 mg/day vs injection with corticosteroid and anaesthetic
Benefits · People with rotator cuff disease
Topical glyceryl trinitrate for rotator cuff disease (2009) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings: 5 mg/day vs injection with corticosteroid and anaesthetic
Pain ‐ not reported1 · People with rotator cuff disease
Topical glyceryl trinitrate for rotator cuff disease (2009) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings: 5 mg/day vs injection with corticosteroid and anaesthetic
Function ‐ not measured · People with rotator cuff disease
Topical glyceryl trinitrate for rotator cuff disease (2009) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings: 5 mg/day vs injection with corticosteroid and anaesthetic
Harms · People with rotator cuff disease
Topical glyceryl trinitrate for rotator cuff disease (2009) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings: 5 mg/day vs placebo
Function ‐ not measured · People with rotator cuff disease
Topical glyceryl trinitrate for rotator cuff disease (2009) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings: 5 mg/day vs placebo
Harms · People with rotator cuff disease
Topical glyceryl trinitrate for rotator cuff disease (2009) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings: 5 mg/day vs placebo
Headache ‐ not reported4 · People with rotator cuff disease
Topical glyceryl trinitrate for rotator cuff disease (2009) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings: 1.25 mg/day plus rehabilitation vs placebo plus rehabilitation
Benefits · People with rotator cuff disease
Topical glyceryl trinitrate for rotator cuff disease (2009) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings: 1.25 mg/day plus rehabilitation vs placebo plus rehabilitation
Pain ‐ not reported1 · People with rotator cuff disease
Topical glyceryl trinitrate for rotator cuff disease (2009) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Radiological damage ‐ not measured · patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
Dynamic exercise programs (aerobic capacity and/or muscle strength training) in patients with rheumatoid… (2009) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Radiological damage ‐ not measured · patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
Dynamic exercise programs (aerobic capacity and/or muscle strength training) in patients with rheumatoid… (2009) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Radiological damage ‐ not measured · patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
Dynamic exercise programs (aerobic capacity and/or muscle strength training) in patients with rheumatoid… (2009) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Bioresorbable plates or screws (or both) vs Titanium plates or screws (used as lag screws) or both
Any chronic or lasting pain measured using any validated scale after 3 weeks · Participants over 18 years of age with fractures of the facial skeleton including the mandible, maxilla, zygoma… · After 3 weeks
Resorbable versus titanium plates for facial fractures (2009) · Cochrane
Planned primary outcome not assessed: none of the retrieved studies met the inclusion criteria, so no data were available for analysis. Verbatim (Effects of interventions): "Although 53 studies were retrieved in our…0 studiesNo studies
Arthrocentesis and lavage vs Arthroscopy
Maximum bite force · Adults with temporomandibular joint disorders (internal derangement; anterior disc displacement with or without…
Arthrocentesis and lavage for treating temporomandibular joint disorders (2009) · Cochrane
To date, no randomised controlled trial in this area reported maximum bite force.0 studiesNo studies
Primary surgical intervention (curettage, peripheral osteotomy, or resection) vs Primary non-surgical intervention (intralesional corticosteroids, subcutaneous calcitonin, interferon alpha, or imatinib)
Complete remission · Patients with a pathological diagnosis of central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) of the jaws
Interventions for central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) of the jaws (2009) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Bioresorbable plates or screws (or both) vs Titanium plates or screws (used as lag screws) or both
Status of occlusion (e.g. Angle's classification, ANB, Wits analysis) · Participants over 18 years of age with fractures of the facial skeleton including the mandible, maxilla, zygoma… · Up to 3 years postoperatively
Resorbable versus titanium plates for facial fractures (2009) · Cochrane
Planned secondary outcome not assessed: none of the retrieved studies met the inclusion criteria, so no data were available for analysis. Verbatim (Effects of interventions): "Although 53 studies were retrieved in our…0 studiesNo studies
Any denture cleansing method (mechanical or chemical) vs Another method, sham/placebo, or no treatment
Outcome NR · Wearers of removable partial dentures (RPD), over the age of 18
Interventions for cleaning dentures in adults (2009) · Cochrane
No included study assessed removable partial denture (RPD) wearers; all six included trials assessed complete denture wearers (Discussion; Implications for research: 'No included study assessed removable partial…0 studiesNo studies
Enamel matrix derivative (EMD; Emdogain) vs Various bone grafting (BG) procedures (animal-derived or synthetic bone / bioactive ceramic filler)
Change in marginal (radiographic) bone level · Patients affected by chronic, aggressive, or early onset periodontitis, with intrabony defects having an intrabony… · 1 year (time-points 1, 5 and 10 years planned)
Enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain®) for periodontal tissue regeneration in intrabony defects (2009) · Cochrane
Radiographic bone level: no trial evaluated this.0 studiesNo studies
Enamel matrix derivative (EMD; Emdogain) vs Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with barriers
Aesthetics · Patients affected by chronic, aggressive, or early onset periodontitis, with intrabony defects having an intrabony… · 1 year (time-points 1, 5 and 10 years planned)
Enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain®) for periodontal tissue regeneration in intrabony defects (2009) · Cochrane
SoF (Emdogain vs GTR): Aesthetics - See comment; 0 [0]; No studies reported this.0 studiesNo studies
Aciclovir (oral or intravenous) for treatment vs Placebo
Cost of oral care · Patients being treated for cancer with established oral HSV infection (bone marrow transplant recipients /…
Interventions for the prevention and treatment of herpes simplex virus in patients being treated for cancer (2009) · Cochrane
For the treatment comparison (aciclovir versus placebo), no data were available for recurrence of lesions, amount of analgesia, days of stay in hospital, cost of oral care or patient quality of life.0 studiesNo studies
Dental fillings (restorations) vs No treatment
Outcome NR · Children aged 12 years or younger with tooth decay involving at least one tooth in the primary dentition, symptomatic… · Minimum 6 months follow-up
Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition (2009) · Cochrane
"No studies were found that compared restorations versus extractions or no treatment as an intervention in children with caries in the primary dentition."NRNo studies
Ultrasonic treatment or microwave disinfection device vs Another method, sham/placebo, or no treatment
Outcome NR · Adults (over 18) wearing complete dentures (CD) or removable partial dentures (RPD)
Interventions for cleaning dentures in adults (2009) · Cochrane
The effectiveness of ultrasonic or microwave devices as an intervention for routine use was not studied according to a randomised controlled trial design (Implications for research).0 studiesNo studies
Bioresorbable plates or screws (or both) vs Titanium plates or screws (used as lag screws) or both
Healing and union of fracture (versus mal-union and non-union) · Participants over 18 years of age with fractures of the facial skeleton including the mandible, maxilla, zygoma… · Up to 3 years postoperatively
Resorbable versus titanium plates for facial fractures (2009) · Cochrane
Planned primary outcome not assessed: none of the retrieved studies met the inclusion criteria, so no data were available for analysis. Verbatim (Effects of interventions): "Although 53 studies were retrieved in our…0 studiesNo studies
Primary surgical intervention (curettage, peripheral osteotomy, or resection) vs Primary non-surgical intervention (intralesional corticosteroids, subcutaneous calcitonin, interferon alpha, or imatinib)
Partial reduction · Patients with a pathological diagnosis of central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) of the jaws
Interventions for central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) of the jaws (2009) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Primary surgical intervention (curettage, peripheral osteotomy, or resection) vs Primary non-surgical intervention (intralesional corticosteroids, subcutaneous calcitonin, interferon alpha, or imatinib)
Recurrence · Patients with a pathological diagnosis of central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) of the jaws
Interventions for central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) of the jaws (2009) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Occlusal adjustment as an adjunct to surgical periodontal therapy vs Surgical periodontal therapy alone (no occlusal adjustment)
Patient acceptability of treatment and its side effects · Adults (aged 18 years or older) with a clinical diagnosis of (chronic) periodontitis · Minimum 3 months (planned)
Occlusal interventions for periodontitis in adults (2008) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Minimal incision palatopharyngoplasty (MIPP) vs MIPP with additional individualised velopharyngeal surgery (pharyngeal flap or sphincter pharyngoplasty)
Quality of life (self or carer evaluated, validated questionnaires) · Children or adolescents aged 3 years or older with velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) associated with non-syndromic…
Interventions for the management of submucous cleft palate (2008) · Cochrane
No data were available for this patient-reported outcome in the single included trial.0 studiesNo studies
Occlusal adjustment as an adjunct to surgical periodontal therapy vs Surgical periodontal therapy alone (no occlusal adjustment)
Adverse effects (e.g. thermal sensitivity, over-eruption, TMJ symptoms, poor aesthetics, reduced oral hygiene) · Adults (aged 18 years or older) with a clinical diagnosis of (chronic) periodontitis · Minimum 3 months (planned)
Occlusal interventions for periodontitis in adults (2008) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Ultrasonic instrumentation used alone (any ultrasonic device designed specifically for root canal treatment and capable of the active or passive removal of dentine within the root canal) vs Hand instrumentation used alone (files and reamers used manually)
Outcome NR · People over 18 years of age with single or multiple permanent teeth with a completely formed apex and no evidence of…
Hand and ultrasonic instrumentation for orthograde root canal treatment of permanent teeth (2008) · Cochrane
No eligible randomised controlled trials were identified.NRNo studies