Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,929 questions · 15,213 findings · 2,394 reviews

No studies found 15,213 · 100%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Binocular iPad treatment vs occlusion therapy

Change in the interocular difference in contrast sensitivity Any validated test, from baseline to 16 (± 2) weeks · 5‐ to 8‐year‐old children with amblyopia

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Binocular iPad treatment vs occlusion therapy

Measurable change in stereopsis after 8 (± 2) weeks and 16 (± 2) weeks of intervention 'Real change' in stereopsis is defined as a change in stereoacuity of two or more octaves. · 5‐ to 8‐year‐old children with amblyopia

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Live birth or ongoing pregnancy: early (EFP) vs late (LFP) follicular phase · infertile women or couples attempting to conceive through sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination (IUI)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Live birth or ongoing pregnancy: prior cycle vs IUI cycle · infertile women or couples attempting to conceive through sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination (IUI)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review