Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

1,290 questions · 1,309 findings · 571 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1,309 · 100%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Booster vs placebo/no booster

Serious adverse events

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Efficacy and safety of COVID‐19 vaccines 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Low‐dose colchicine vs NSAIDs

Serious adverse events · acute gout

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Colchicine for acute gout 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) vs sham CPAP

Serious adverse events · erectile dysfunction in men with obstructive sleep apnoea

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐invasive positive airway pressure therapy for improving erectile dysfunction in men with obstructive sleep apnoea 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Individual level interventions vs control

Serious adverse events · healthy individuals and those with a pre‐existing health condition

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Individual‐level interventions to reduce personal exposure to outdoor air pollution and their effects on people with… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

IM erythropoietin vs oral placebo

Serious adverse events · IBD patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for treating iron deficiency anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Casirivimab/imdevimab vs placebo

Serious adverse events · non‐hospitalised individuals with COVID‐19 (asymptomatic and mild disease)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

SARS‐CoV‐2‐neutralising monoclonal antibodies for treatment of COVID‐19 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Vitamin D vs placebo or usual care

Serious adverse events · individuals with moderate to severe disease

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Vitamin D supplementation for the treatment of COVID‐19: a living systematic review 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Oral 5‐aminosalicylic acid vs sulfasalazine

Serious adverse events · Patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Oral 5‐aminosalicylic acid for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Metformin vs oral contraceptive pill (OCP)

Minor adverse events · adult women with PCOS

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Metformin versus the combined oral contraceptive pill for hirsutism, acne, and menstrual pattern in polycystic ovary… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Oral contraceptive pill (OCP) vs metformin combined with OCP

Minor adverse events · adolescent women with PCOS

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Metformin versus the combined oral contraceptive pill for hirsutism, acne, and menstrual pattern in polycystic ovary… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Metformin vs metformin combined with OCP

Minor adverse events · adult women with PCOS

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Metformin versus the combined oral contraceptive pill for hirsutism, acne, and menstrual pattern in polycystic ovary… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Probiotic + 5‐aminosalicylic acid (5‐ASA) (mesalazine) vs 5‐aminosalicylic acid (5‐ASA) (mesalazine)

Serious adverse events · people with active UC

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Probiotics for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Probiotic + 5‐aminosalicylic acid (5‐ASA) (mesalazine) vs 5‐aminosalicylic acid (5‐ASA) (mesalazine)

Serious adverse events · Patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Probiotics for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Pine bark extract vs placebo

Serious adverse events · children with ADHD

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Pine bark (Pinus spp.) extract for treating chronic disorders 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Pine bark extract vs placebo

Serious adverse events · adults with CVI

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Pine bark (Pinus spp.) extract for treating chronic disorders 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Pine bark extract vs control

Serious adverse events · adults with diabetes mellitus type I

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Pine bark (Pinus spp.) extract for treating chronic disorders 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Pine bark extract vs placebo

Serious adverse events · adults with diabetes mellitus type II

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Pine bark (Pinus spp.) extract for treating chronic disorders 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Pine bark extract vs placebo

Serious adverse events · adults with diabetes mellitus type I and II combined

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Pine bark (Pinus spp.) extract for treating chronic disorders 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Pine bark extract vs placebo

Serious adverse events · men with erectile dysfunction

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Pine bark (Pinus spp.) extract for treating chronic disorders 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Pine bark extract vs control

Serious adverse events · women with sexual dysfunction

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Pine bark (Pinus spp.) extract for treating chronic disorders 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found