Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

2 questions in 2 reviews · cluster CL0312

current versions
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 2 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Intervention categories, outcome domains and clusters are a proposed key pending human validation. Clear all filters

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Higher consumption of snacks / sugar / soft drinks vs Lower consumption
Dental caries · Healthy children and adolescents in the United Arab Emirates
Oral Health of Children and Adolescents in the United Arab Emirates: A Systematic Review of the Past Decade. (2021)
Soft drink consumption (Khadri et al.: 0.31, 95% CI 0.14-0.47) and a high extent of snacking (Hashim et al.: high vs low snack level aRR 1.46, 95% CI 1.26-1.70; snacking >=3x vs once daily aRR 1.25, 1.00-1.57) were…NRUngraded
Frequent carbohydrate / sugary food intake vs Infrequent carbohydrate intake
Dental caries (presence) · Individuals in East Africa assessed for dental caries
Prevalence of Dental Caries and Associated Factors in East Africa, 2000-2020: Systematic Review and… (2021)
OR 1.575 [1.13, 3.051]11 studies · 5651 participantsUngraded