What do systematic reviews say?

Intervention not reported

• Trunk training following stroke 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 108 participants
  Very low

Intervention not reported

• Trunk training following stroke 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  6 studies · 201 participants
  Very low

Intervention not reported

• Trunk training following stroke 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  9 studies · 229 participants
  Very low

Intervention not reported

• Trunk training following stroke 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  36 studies · 1217 participants
  Very low

Thrombo‐aspiration alone vs stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone

Thrombo‐aspiration alone showed no clear difference in functional independence at 3 months (mRS 0 to 2) (primary outcome) compared with stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone (high certainty).

• Different types of percutaneous endovascular interventions for acute ischemic stroke 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.97 [0.82, 1.13]
  2 studies · 633 participants
  High

Thrombo‐aspiration alone vs stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone

Thrombo‐aspiration alone showed no clear difference in successful reperfusion (mTICI 2b to 3) postprocedure compared with stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone (high certainty).

• Different types of percutaneous endovascular interventions for acute ischemic stroke 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.01 [0.95, 1.07]
  2 studies · 650 participants
  High

Thrombo‐aspiration alone vs stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone

Thrombo‐aspiration alone showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality within 3 months compared with stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone (high certainty).

• Different types of percutaneous endovascular interventions for acute ischemic stroke 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.01 [0.74, 1.37]
  2 studies · 633 participants
  High

Thrombo‐aspiration alone vs stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone

Thrombo‐aspiration alone showed no clear difference in intracranial hemorrhage on imaging at 24 hours compared with stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone (high certainty).

• Different types of percutaneous endovascular interventions for acute ischemic stroke 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.03 [0.86, 1.24]
  2 studies · 645 participants
  High

Thrombo‐aspiration alone vs stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone

Thrombo‐aspiration alone showed no clear difference in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage at 24 hours compared with stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone (high certainty).

• Different types of percutaneous endovascular interventions for acute ischemic stroke 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.9 [0.49, 1.68]
  2 studies · 645 participants
  High

Thrombo‐aspiration alone vs stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone

Thrombo‐aspiration alone showed no clear difference in procedure‐related adverse events within 3 months compared with stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone (high certainty).

• Different types of percutaneous endovascular interventions for acute ischemic stroke 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.98 [0.68, 1.41]
  2 studies · 651 participants
  High

Intervention not reported

• Head impulse, nystagmus, and test of skew examination for diagnosing central causes of acute vestibular syndrome 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  12 studies · 1890 participants
  Low

Intervention not reported

• Head impulse, nystagmus, and test of skew examination for diagnosing central causes of acute vestibular syndrome 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  95 participants
  Moderate

Intervention not reported

• Head impulse, nystagmus, and test of skew examination for diagnosing central causes of acute vestibular syndrome 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  94 participants
  GRADE not reported

Intervention not reported

• Head impulse, nystagmus, and test of skew examination for diagnosing central causes of acute vestibular syndrome 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 199 participants
  Very low

Intervention not reported

• Head impulse, nystagmus, and test of skew examination for diagnosing central causes of acute vestibular syndrome 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  5 studies · 451 participants
  Low

Intervention not reported

• Head impulse, nystagmus, and test of skew examination for diagnosing central causes of acute vestibular syndrome 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 163 participants
  Moderate

Intervention not reported

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Head impulse, nystagmus, and test of skew examination for diagnosing central causes of acute vestibular syndrome 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Intervention not reported

• Head impulse, nystagmus, and test of skew examination for diagnosing central causes of acute vestibular syndrome 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  9 studies · 905 participants
  Low

Intervention not reported

• Head impulse, nystagmus, and test of skew examination for diagnosing central causes of acute vestibular syndrome 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 239 participants
  Very low

Intervention not reported

• Head impulse, nystagmus, and test of skew examination for diagnosing central causes of acute vestibular syndrome 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  9 studies · 1128 participants
  Moderate