Pain · other open traumatic wounds
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse events · open fracture wounds
1 finding from 1 review
Time to closure or coverage surgery · open fracture wounds
1 finding from 1 review
Pain · open fracture wounds
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Complete wound healing · other open traumatic wounds
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Wound infection · other open traumatic wounds
NPWT 125 mmHg showed no clear difference in wound infection compared with standard care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events · other open traumatic wounds
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Time to closure or coverage surgery · other open traumatic wounds
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Contrasts · people with venous leg ulcers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Foam versus nonadherent dressing · people with venous leg ulcers
The intervention showed no clear difference in foam versus nonadherent dressing (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 1.15 [0.91, 1.44]
Studies not reported
Low
Intervention not reported
Hydrocolloid versus nonadherent dressing · people with venous leg ulcers
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes hydrocolloid versus nonadherent dressing (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 1.04 [0.85, 1.29]
Studies not reported
Very low
Intervention not reported
Sucralfate versus nonadherent · people with venous leg ulcers
The intervention may leads to higher sucralfate versus nonadherent (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 6.8 [2.24, 20.7]
Studies not reported
Low
Intervention not reported
Sucralfate versus foam · people with venous leg ulcers
The intervention may leads to higher sucralfate versus foam (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 5.94 [1.96, 18]
Studies not reported
Low
Intervention not reported
Sucralfate versus hydrocolloid · people with venous leg ulcers
The intervention may leads to higher sucralfate versus hydrocolloid (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 6.51 [2.17, 19.6]
Studies not reported
Low
Intervention not reported
Silver versus nonadherent · people with venous leg ulcers
The intervention probably leads to higher silver versus nonadherent (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 2.43 [1.58, 3.74]
Studies not reported
Moderate
Intervention not reported
Silver versus foam · people with venous leg ulcers
The intervention may leads to higher silver versus foam (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 2.12 [1.46, 3.07]
Studies not reported
Low
Intervention not reported
Silver versus hydrocolloid · people with venous leg ulcers
The intervention may leads to higher silver versus hydrocolloid (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 2.32 [1.58, 3.41]
Studies not reported
Low
Intervention not reported
Sucralfate versus silver · people with venous leg ulcers
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes sucralfate versus silver (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 2.8 [0.88, 8.97]
Studies not reported
Very low
Intervention not reported
Foam versus hydrocolloid · people with venous leg ulcers
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes foam versus hydrocolloid (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 1.1 [0.93, 1.28]
Studies not reported
Very low
Ulcers completely healed · people with venous leg ulcers
It is very uncertain whether high frequency ultrasound changes proportion of ulcers completely healed at 3 weeks compared with no ultrasound (very low certainty).
3 findings from 1 review
RR 2.05 [0.24, 17.23]
1 study · 65 participants
Very low
RR 1.21 [0.86, 1.71]
6 studies · 678 participants
Low
RR 1.26 [0.92, 1.73]
3 studies · 489 participants
Moderate