Intervention not reported
All‐cause mortality · adult male patients
The intervention showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Prostate cancer‐specific mortality · adult male patients
The intervention showed no clear difference in prostate cancer‐specific mortality (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Prostate cancer diagnosis · adult male patients
The intervention may leads to higher prostate cancer diagnosis (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Tumour stage (localised T1‐T2, N0, M0) · adult male patients
The intervention may leads to higher tumour stage (localised T1‐T2, N0, M0) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Tumour stage (advanced T3‐4, N1, M1) · adult male patients
The intervention probably leads to lower tumour stage (advanced T3‐4, N1, M1) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Health‐related quality of life (physical) · patients with prostate cancer
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
1414 participants
Low
Health‐related quality of life (mental) · patients with prostate cancer
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
1416 participants
Moderate
Self‐efficacy · patients with prostate cancer
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
337 participants
Very low
Health‐related knowledge – Prostate cancer knowledge Standardised on score 0 (no knowledge) to 100 (perfect knowledge) Time point: long‐term (approx. 7 months post‐intervention) · patients with prostate cancer
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
506 participants
Very low
Uncertainty · patients with prostate cancer
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
916 participants
Very low
Distress at · patients with prostate cancer
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
916 participants
Very low
Depression at end of intervention · patients with prostate cancer
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
434 participants
Very low
Microbiological efficacy ‐ pathogen eradication · patients with chronic bacterial prostatitis
It is very uncertain whether levofloxacin changes microbiological efficacy ‐ pathogen eradication compared with ciprofloxacin (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Clinical efficacy ‐ cure or improvement at · patients with chronic bacterial prostatitis
It is very uncertain whether ciprofloxacin changes clinical efficacy ‐ cure or improvement at end of treatment compared with comparator fluoroquinolone (very low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Adverse effects of treatment ‐ any adverse effects · patients with chronic bacterial prostatitis
Ciprofloxacin showed no clear difference in adverse effects of treatment ‐ any adverse effects compared with comparator fluoroquinolone (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Microbiological efficacy ‐ pathogen eradication · patients with chronic bacterial prostatitis
It is very uncertain whether levofloxacin changes microbiological efficacy ‐ pathogen eradication compared with comparator fluoroquinolone (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Clinical efficacy ‐ cure or improvement at · patients with chronic bacterial prostatitis
2 findings from 1 review
Adverse effects of treatment ‐ any adverse effects · patients with chronic bacterial prostatitis
Levofloxacin showed no clear difference in adverse effects of treatment ‐ any adverse effects compared with comparator fluoroquinolone (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Clinical efficacy ‐ cure or improvement at · patients with chronic bacterial prostatitis
Levofloxacin showed no clear difference in clinical efficacy ‐ cure or improvement at end of treatment compared with ciprofloxacin (low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Adverse effects of treatment ‐ any adverse effects · patients with chronic bacterial prostatitis
Levofloxacin showed no clear difference in adverse effects of treatment ‐ any adverse effects compared with ciprofloxacin (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review