evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

2,510 questions · 2,653 findings · 194 reviews · Gynaecology and Fertility

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 531 · 20%GRADE not reported 76 · 2.9%Very low 826 · 31.1%Low 855 · 32.2%Moderate 341 · 12.9%High 24 · 0.9%

Intrauterine infusion of autologous platelet‐rich plasma vs no intervention

Adverse events: ectopic pregnancy · women undergoing assisted reproduction

It is very uncertain whether intrauterine injection of autologous platelet‐rich plasma changes adverse events: ectopic pregnancy compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intrauterine infusion/injection of autologous platelet‐rich plasma vs placebo or no intervention

Live birth or ongoing pregnancy · women undergoing assisted reproduction

It is very uncertain whether intrauterine infusion/injection of autologous platelet‐rich plasma changes live birth (or ongoing pregnancy) compared with no intervention or placebo (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intrauterine infusion/injection of autologous platelet‐rich plasma vs placebo or no intervention

Miscarriage · women undergoing assisted reproduction

It is very uncertain whether intrauterine infusion/injection of autologous platelet‐rich plasma changes miscarriage compared with no intervention or placebo (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intrauterine infusion/injection of autologous platelet‐rich plasma vs placebo or no intervention

Clinical pregnancy · women undergoing assisted reproduction

It is very uncertain whether intrauterine infusion/injection of autologous platelet‐rich plasma changes clinical pregnancy compared with no intervention or placebo (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intrauterine infusion/injection of autologous platelet‐rich plasma vs placebo or no intervention

Adverse event ‐ multiple pregnancy · women undergoing assisted reproduction

It is very uncertain whether intrauterine infusion/injection of autologous platelet‐rich plasma changes adverse events: multiple pregnancy compared with no intervention or placebo (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intrauterine infusion/injection of autologous platelet‐rich plasma vs placebo or no intervention

Adverse events: ectopic pregnancy · women undergoing assisted reproduction

It is very uncertain whether intrauterine infusion/injection of autologous platelet‐rich plasma changes adverse events: ectopic pregnancy compared with no intervention or placebo (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ ICSI vs c‐IVF

Live birth · : Couples with males presenting normal total sperm count and motility were included in this review.

Summary of findings table ‐ ICSI showed no clear difference in live Birth compared with c‐IVF (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ ICSI vs c‐IVF

Multiple pregnancy · : Couples with males presenting normal total sperm count and motility were included in this review.

Summary of findings table ‐ ICSI showed no clear difference in multiple Pregnancy compared with c‐IVF (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ ICSI vs c‐IVF

Ectopic pregnancy · : Couples with males presenting normal total sperm count and motility were included in this review.

Summary of findings table ‐ ICSI showed no clear difference in ectopic Pregnancy compared with c‐IVF (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ ICSI vs c‐IVF

Pre‐eclampsia · : Couples with males presenting normal total sperm count and motility were included in this review.

Summary of findings table ‐ ICSI showed no clear difference in pre‐Eclampsia compared with c‐IVF (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ ICSI vs c‐IVF

Prematurity · : Couples with males presenting normal total sperm count and motility were included in this review.

Summary of findings table ‐ ICSI showed no clear difference in prematurity compared with c‐IVF (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ ICSI vs c‐IVF

Clinical pregnancy · : Couples with males presenting normal total sperm count and motility were included in this review.

Summary of findings table ‐ ICSI showed no clear difference in clinical Pregnancy compared with c‐IVF (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ ICSI vs c‐IVF

Viable intrauterine Pregnancy · : Couples with males presenting normal total sperm count and motility were included in this review.

Summary of findings table ‐ ICSI showed no clear difference in viable intrauterine Pregnancy compared with c‐IVF (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ ICSI vs c‐IVF

Miscarriage · : Couples with males presenting normal total sperm count and motility were included in this review.

Summary of findings table ‐ ICSI showed no clear difference in miscarriage compared with c‐IVF (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review