Summary of findings table ‐ ICSI vs c‐IVF: Clinical pregnancy
Summary of findings table ‐ ICSI showed no clear difference in clinical Pregnancy compared with c‐IVF (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of findings table ‐ ICSI vs c‐IVF Clinical Pregnancy · : Couples with males presenting normal total sperm count and motility were included in this review. Summary of findings table ‐ ICSI showed no clear difference in clinical Pregnancy compared with c‐IVF (low certainty). Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in vitro fertilisation in couples with males presenting… (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1 [0.88, 1.13] | 3 studies · 1539 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in vitro fertilisation in couples with males presenting with normal total sperm count… 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.