CAS improvement (decrease) by 2 or more points · thyroid‐associated ophthalmopathy
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Rituximab changes CAS improvement (decrease) by 2 or more points compared with placebo (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
NOSPECS improvement (decrease) by 2 classes or more · thyroid‐associated ophthalmopathy
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Rituximab changes NOSPECS improvement (decrease) by 2 classes or more compared with placebo (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Failure of re‐epithelialisation by day 21 post‐injury Image analysis of digital photographs · people with moderate acute ocular burns
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes failure of re‐epithelialisation by day 21 post‐injury Image analysis… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Symblepharon Presence of symblepharon · people with severe acute ocular burns
The intervention showed no clear difference in symblepharon Presence of symblepharon (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Time‐to‐epithelialisation (days) · people with severe acute ocular burns
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Adverse effects · people with severe acute ocular burns
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
**Visual acuity at final · people with moderate acute ocular burns
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Corneal neovascularisation Number of quadrants affected · people with moderate acute ocular burns
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes corneal neovascularisation Number of quadrants affected (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Symblepharon Presence of symblepharon · people with moderate acute ocular burns
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes symblepharon Presence of symblepharon (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Time‐to‐epithelialisation (days) · people with moderate acute ocular burns
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Adverse effects · people with moderate acute ocular burns
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Failure of re‐epithelialisation by day 21 post‐injury Image analysis of digital photographs · people with severe acute ocular burns
The intervention showed no clear difference in failure of re‐epithelialisation by day 21 post‐injury Image analysis… (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
**Visual acuity at final · people with severe acute ocular burns
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Corneal neovascularisation Number of quadrants or central cornea involved · people with severe acute ocular burns
The intervention showed no clear difference in corneal neovascularisation Number of quadrants or central cornea… (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Visual acuity · 5‐ to 8‐year‐old children with amblyopia
2 findings from 1 review
Change in distance BCVA in the amblyopic eye 12 months after cessation of treatment · 5‐ to 8‐year‐old children with amblyopia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Participant adherence to intervention · 5‐ to 8‐year‐old children with amblyopia
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of participants experiencing an adverse event of permanent diplopia (double vision) Reports of diplopia across all measured time points · 5‐ to 8‐year‐old children with amblyopia
1 finding from 1 review
Change in the interocular difference in contrast sensitivity Any validated test, from baseline to 16 (± 2) weeks · 5‐ to 8‐year‐old children with amblyopia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Measurable change in stereopsis after 8 (± 2) weeks and 16 (± 2) weeks of intervention 'Real change' in stereopsis is defined as a change in stereoacuity of two or more octaves. · 5‐ to 8‐year‐old children with amblyopia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found