Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,860 questions · 64,864 findings · 4,913 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 13,869 · 21.4%GRADE not reported 3,491 · 5.4%Very low 16,300 · 25.1%Low 17,338 · 26.7%Moderate 10,900 · 16.8%High 2,966 · 4.6%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Face‐down positioning vs no face‐down positioning or posturing after macular hole surgery

Closure of macular hole · participants with idiopathic macular hole

Face‐down positioning or posturing showed no clear difference in macular hole closure (anatomical assessment) compared with no face‐down positioning or posturing after macular hole surgery (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Face‐down positioning vs no face‐down positioning or posturing after macular hole surgery

Improved visual acuity (ETDRS chart at 4 metres) · participants with idiopathic macular hole

It is very uncertain whether face‐down positioning or posturing changes improved visual acuity (ETDRS chart at 4 metres) compared with no face‐down positioning or posturing after macular hole surgery (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) vs no RIPC

Perioperative mortality · people undergoing elective major vascular surgery

Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) showed no clear difference in perioperative mortality (within 1 month after operation) compared with no RIPC (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) vs no RIPC

Myocardial infarction (0 to 30 days) · people undergoing elective major vascular surgery

Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) showed no clear difference in myocardial infarction (within 1 month after operation) compared with no RIPC (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) vs no RIPC

Renal impairment (within 1 month after operation) · people undergoing elective major vascular surgery

Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) showed no clear difference in renal impairment (within 1 month after operation) compared with no RIPC (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) vs no RIPC

Limb loss (within 1 month after operation) · people undergoing elective major vascular surgery

Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) showed no clear difference in limb loss (within 1 month after operation) compared with no RIPC (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review