Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

1,495 questions · 1,554 findings · 140 reviews · Heart

No studies found 272 · 17.5%GRADE not reported 44 · 2.8%Very low 329 · 21.2%Low 464 · 29.9%Moderate 319 · 20.5%High 126 · 8.1%

Angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors vs placebo or no treatment

Cardiovascular mortality · patients with chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) showed no clear difference in cardiovascular mortality (RR) compared with placebo or no treatment (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors vs placebo or no treatment

Heart failure hospitalisation (RR) · patients with chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) showed no clear difference in heart failure hospitalisation (RR) compared with placebo or no treatment (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors vs placebo or no treatment

All‐cause mortality (RR) · patients with chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality (RR) compared with placebo or no treatment (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) vs placebo or no treatment

Cardiovascular mortality · patients with chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) showed no clear difference in cardiovascular mortality (RR) compared with placebo or no treatment (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) vs placebo or no treatment

Heart failure hospitalisation (RR) · patients with chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) showed no clear difference in heart failure hospitalisation (RR) compared with placebo or no treatment (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) vs placebo or no treatment

Hyperkalaemia · patients with chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) leads to higher hyperkalaemia compared with placebo or no treatment (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) vs placebo or no treatment

All‐cause mortality (RR) · patients with chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality (RR) compared with placebo or no treatment (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Beta‐blockers vs placebo or no treatment

Heart failure hospitalisation (RR) · patients with chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

It is very uncertain whether beta‐blockers changes heart failure hospitalisation (RR) compared with placebo or no treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) vs usual care

Cardiovascular mortality · patients with chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) showed no clear difference in cardiovascular mortality (RR) Median compared with usual care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) vs usual care

Time to first hospitalisation for heart failure during · patients with chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) showed no clear difference in heart failure hospitalisation, first (RR) Range of compared with usual care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review