Question · asked by 1 review
Mobile phone interventions vs usual care: Adverse events
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Mobile phone interventions vs usual care Adverse events · people prescribed medication for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease Mobile phone‐based interventions for improving adherence to medication prescribed for the primary prevention… (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 6 studies · 8285 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile phone‐based interventions for improving adherence to medication prescribed for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.