Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4 questions · 4 findings · 3 reviews · Eyes and Vision

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 2 · 50%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 2 · 50%High 0 · 0%

Phacoemulsification vs phacoemulsification plus trabeculectomy

Quality of life measures (at 12 months) · participants with primary angle‐closure glaucoma

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Lens extraction for chronic angle‐closure glaucoma 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Phacoemulsification vs laser peripheral iridotomy

Quality of life measures(measured on the EQ‐5D; higher = better) (at 12 months) · participants with primary angle‐closure glaucoma

1 finding from 1 review

Lens extraction for chronic angle‐closure glaucoma 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Moderate

5000‐centistoke vs 1000‐centistoke

QoL · surgery for retinal detachment associated with proliferative vitreoretinopathy

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Tamponade in surgery for retinal detachment associated with proliferative vitreoretinopathy 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Conventional occlusion vs atropine penalization

Quality of life (different measures and time points reported in the included studies) Assessed at different time points (17 weeks or 6 months) by patient preference or the Amblyopia Treatment Index questionnaire. · Participants of any age with either unilateral strabismic, anisometropic, or mixed (strabismic‐refractive) amblyopia; deprivation…

1 finding from 1 review

Conventional occlusion versus pharmacologic penalization for amblyopia 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 256 participants
Moderate