What do systematic reviews say?

Silicone gel sheeting vs topical onion extract

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Silicone gel sheeting for treating hypertrophic scars 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Silicone gel sheeting vs polyurethane

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Silicone gel sheeting for treating hypertrophic scars 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Silicone gel sheeting vs self‐adhesive propylene glycol and hydroxyethyl cellulose sheeting

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Silicone gel sheeting for treating hypertrophic scars 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Silicone gel sheeting vs Gecko Nanoplast

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Silicone gel sheeting for treating hypertrophic scars 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Silicone gel sheeting vs no silicone gel sheeting

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Silicone gel sheeting for treating hypertrophic scars 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Voice‐enabling communication aid vs usual care with an aid

• Interventions to enable communication for adult patients requiring an artificial airway with or without mechanical… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 63 participants
  Low

Non‐vocal communication aid vs usual care without an aid

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions to enable communication for adult patients requiring an artificial airway with or without mechanical… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Non‐vocal communication aid vs usual care with an aid

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions to enable communication for adult patients requiring an artificial airway with or without mechanical… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Intervention not reported

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions in outside‐school hours childcare settings for promoting physical activity amongst schoolchildren aged 4… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Stem cell therapy vs peripheral therapy with granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor

• Stem cell therapy for dilated cardiomyopathy 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 22 participants
  Low

Stem cell therapy vs control

• Stem cell therapy for dilated cardiomyopathy 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  5 studies · 272 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings: insulin detemir vs insulin glargine

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• (Ultra‐)long‐acting insulin analogues for people with type 1 diabetes mellitus 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

[Radial] B‐mode ultrasound guidance vs palpation and landmarks

• Ultrasound guidance for arterial (other than femoral) catheterisation in adults 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 72 participants
  Very low

Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs reactive air surfaces

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs reactive water‐filled surfaces

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs reactive fibre surfaces

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces on operating tables and subsequently on ward beds vs reactive gel surfaces on operating tables followed by foam surfaces on ward beds

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Foam surfaces vs reactive air surfaces

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Foam surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Foam surfaces vs reactive fibre surfaces

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Foam surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Foam surfaces vs reactive gel surfaces

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Foam surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found