Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

3,241 questions · 3,336 findings · 1,340 reviews

No studies found 1,581 · 47.4%GRADE not reported 352 · 10.6%Very low 512 · 15.3%Low 509 · 15.3%Moderate 316 · 9.5%High 66 · 2%

Educational intervention vs usual care or attention control

Global quality of life (at the end of the educational intervention) · patients with cancer‐related fatigue (adults)

Educational interventions showed no clear difference in global quality of life (at the end of the educational intervention) compared with control (usual care or attention control) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single full-coverage metal-ceramic crown over composite core and post vs Direct adhesive composite restoration with post (conventional filling, no crown)

Patient satisfaction / quality of life (validated measure) · People with a permanent tooth that has undergone endodontic (root canal) treatment

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

MHRV vs placebo

SGRQ Total SGRQ (Total) Score. Scale from: 0 to 100. Lower score indicates better quality of life. · asthmatics with sensitivity to house dust mite

MHRV showed no clear difference in quality of life SGRQ Scale from 0 to 100 (0 on the scale is better) compared with placebo (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Minimal incision palatopharyngoplasty (MIPP) vs MIPP with additional individualised velopharyngeal surgery (pharyngeal flap or sphincter pharyngoplasty)

Quality of life (validated questionnaire) · Children or adolescents aged 3 years or older with velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) associated with non-syndromic submucous cleft palate

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Face‐down positioning vs other positioning

Quality of life assessments at 3 months or later (higher is favored) · people with primary macula‐involving rhegmatogenous retinal detachments

It is very uncertain whether face‐down positioning changes quality of life assessments at 3 months or later (higher is favored) compared with other positioning (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Care delivery and self‐management strategies vs usual care

Self‐perception of epilepsy on quality of life (PedsQL) at 3 months · children/adolescents with epilepsy and/or their parents

Care delivery and self‐management strategies showed no clear difference in self‐perception of epilepsy on quality of life (PedsQL) at 3 months compared with usual care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Cancer‐specific quality of life [assessed using a variety of scales, · women with primary breast cancer

The intervention may leads to lower cancer‐specific quality of life [assessed using a variety of scales, (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Personalised one-to-one OHA vs Routine one-to-one OHA

Patient-reported changes in knowledge, attitudes and quality of life · Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition)
1 finding from 1 review

Any form of one-to-one oral hygiene advice (OHA) vs No OHA

Patient-reported changes in knowledge, attitudes and quality of life · Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition)
1 finding from 1 review

Enhanced one-to-one OHA vs Routine one-to-one OHA

Patient-reported changes in knowledge, attitudes and quality of life · Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition)
1 finding from 1 review