Cochrane · systematic review · CD001546

Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis

Jaschinski, T, Mosch, CG, Eikermann, M, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2018 · Cochrane Library

ColorectalAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
24
current version
GRADE rated
21
No studies
3
Included studies
NR
No studies 3 · 12.5%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 8.3%Low 12 · 50%Moderate 7 · 29.2%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults or adolescents for suspected appendicitis

Population: patients with suspected appendicitis
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pain intensity on day 1
Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy
no estimate extracted20 studies · 2421 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Wound infections
Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy
Peto OR 0.42 [0.35, 0.51]63 studies · 7612 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Intra‐abdominal abscesses
Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy
Peto OR 1.65 [1.12, 2.43]53 studies · 6677 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Length of hospital stay (days)
Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy
no estimate extracted46 studies · 5127 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Time until return to normal activities (days)
Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy
no estimate extracted17 studies · 1653 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Quality of life Scale used: 1) Gastro‐intestinal Quality of Life Index 2) SF‐36 questionnaire
Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy
22009 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children for suspected appendicitis

Population: patients with suspected appendicitis
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pain intensity on day
Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy
no estimate extracted1 study · 61 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Wound infections (rate)
Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy
Peto OR 0.25 [0.15, 0.42]10 studies · 1245 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Intra‐abdominal abscesses (rate)
Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy
Peto OR 0.54 [0.24, 1.22]9 studies · 1185 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Length of hospital stay (days)
Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy
no estimate extracted6 studies · 316 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Time until return to normal activities (days)
Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy
no estimate extracted1 study · 383 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Quality of life
Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Subgroup analysis (publication date) ‐ Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults or adolescents for suspected appendicitis

Population: patients with suspected appendicitis
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pain intensity on day 1
Subgroup analysis (publication date) ‐ Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy
no estimate extracted7 studies · 613 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Wound infections
Subgroup analysis (publication date) ‐ Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy
Peto OR 0.37 [0.27, 0.51]19 studies · 2217 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Intra‐abdominal abscesses
Subgroup analysis (publication date) ‐ Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy
Peto OR 0.82 [0.44, 1.51]11 studies · 1466 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Length of hospital stay
Subgroup analysis (publication date) ‐ Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy
no estimate extracted17 studies · 1977 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Time until return to normal activity
Subgroup analysis (publication date) ‐ Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy
no estimate extracted3 studies · 380 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Quality of life Scale used: Gastro‐intestinal Quality of Life Index
Subgroup analysis (publication date) ‐ Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy
no estimate extracted2009 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency

Subgroup analysis (publication date) ‐ Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children for suspected appendicitis

Population: patients with suspected appendicitis
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pain intensity on day 1
Subgroup analysis (publication date) ‐ Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Wound infections
Subgroup analysis (publication date) ‐ Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy
Peto OR 0.27 [0.14, 0.52]5 studies · 783 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Intra‐abdominal abscesses
Subgroup analysis (publication date) ‐ Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy
Peto OR 0.45 [0.19, 1.07]4 studies · 723 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Length of hospital stay
Subgroup analysis (publication date) ‐ Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy
no estimate extracted3 studies · 140 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Time until return to normal activity
Subgroup analysis (publication date) ‐ Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy
no estimate extracted1 study · 383 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Quality of life
Subgroup analysis (publication date) ‐ Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy
no estimate extractedNRNo studies