Question · asked by 1 review
Personalised one-to-one OHA vs Routine one-to-one OHA: Patient-reported changes in knowledge, attitudes and quality of life
- Population
- Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition)
- Intervention
- Personalised one-to-one OHA
- Comparison
- Routine one-to-one OHA
- Outcome
- Patient-reported changes in knowledge, attitudes and quality of life
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Personalised one-to-one OHA vs Routine one-to-one OHA Patient-reported changes in knowledge, attitudes and quality of life · Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition) One‐to‐one oral hygiene advice provided in a dental setting for oral health (2018) · Cochrane All outcomes | Jonsson 2009 (OHQoL-UK oral health-related quality of life) and Ramsay 2018 (dental quality of life, oral hygiene self-efficacy); measured, not synthesised or GRADE-rated. | 2 studies | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| One‐to‐one oral hygiene advice provided in a dental setting for oral health 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2017-11 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.