What do systematic reviews say?

Psychological therapies and/or group programmes vs no treatment or waiting list

• Low vision rehabilitation for better quality of life in visually impaired adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 54 participants
  Very low

Psychological therapies and/or group programmes vs active control

• Low vision rehabilitation for better quality of life in visually impaired adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  4 studies · 600 participants
  Very low

Methods of enhancing vision and/or group programmes vs active control

• Low vision rehabilitation for better quality of life in visually impaired adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 443 participants
  Very low

Multidisciplinary rehabilitation vs active control

• Low vision rehabilitation for better quality of life in visually impaired adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 375 participants
  Very low

Methods of enhancing vision vs no treatment or waiting list

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Low vision rehabilitation for better quality of life in visually impaired adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Multidisciplinary rehabilitation vs no treatment or waiting list

• Low vision rehabilitation for better quality of life in visually impaired adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 183 participants
  Very low

IStent (or iStent inject) vs medical therapy

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Ab interno trabecular bypass surgery with iStent for open‐angle glaucoma 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

IStent in combination with phacoemulsification vs phacoemulsification alone

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Ab interno trabecular bypass surgery with iStent for open‐angle glaucoma 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Phaco‐AIT vs Phaco‐Trab

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Ab interno trabecular bypass surgery with Trabectome for open‐angle glaucoma 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Phacoemulsification + supraciliary microstent surgery vs phacoemulsification alone

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Ab interno supraciliary microstent surgery for open‐angle glaucoma 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Hydrus microstent vs iStent trabecular micro‐bypass stent

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Ab interno trabecular bypass surgery with Schlemm´s canal microstent (Hydrus) for open angle glaucoma 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Cataract surgery with Hydrus microstent vs cataract surgery alone

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Ab interno trabecular bypass surgery with Schlemm´s canal microstent (Hydrus) for open angle glaucoma 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found