Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

7 questions · 7 findings · 3 reviews · Gut

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 4 · 57.1%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 42.9%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Elemental formula supplements vs no supplementation

Change in quality of life · Participants with Crohn's disease in remission

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Enteral nutrition for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Enteral nutrition vs 6‐MP

Change in quality of life · Participants with Crohn's disease in remission

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Enteral nutrition for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Enteral nutrition vs mesalamine

Change in quality of life · Participants with Crohn's disease in remission

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Enteral nutrition for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Elemental formula supplements vs polymeric formula supplements

Change in quality of life · Participants with Crohn's disease in remission

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Enteral nutrition for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings: Molecular‐targeted therapy plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone

Health status and quality of life · people with advanced gastric cancer

1 finding from 1 review

Molecular‐targeted first‐line therapy for advanced gastric cancer 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 53 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Self‐perceived QoL (change from baseline) measured using Peds QL 4.0 Generic Core Scales, scoring 0‐100 points, higher score indicates better quality of life) · children with chronic constipation

1 finding from 1 review

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) for treatment of constipation in children 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 33 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Parent‐perceived QoL (change from baseline) measured using PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales, scoring 0‐100 points, higher score indicates better quality of life) · children with chronic constipation

1 finding from 1 review

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) for treatment of constipation in children 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 33 participants
Very low