Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

16 questions · 16 findings · 6 reviews · Metabolic and Endocrine Disorders

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 12.5%Low 6 · 37.5%Moderate 2 · 12.5%High 6 · 37.5%

Intervention not reported

Change in HbA1c (%) · patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus

1 finding from 1 review

Continuous glucose monitoring systems for type 1 diabetes mellitus 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
6 studies · 963 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

Change in HbA1c (%) · patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus

1 finding from 1 review

Continuous glucose monitoring systems for type 1 diabetes mellitus 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 562 participants
Moderate

Summary of findings: insulin detemir vs Insulin glargin (control)

HbA1c (glycated haemoglobin), change · patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

1 finding from 1 review

Insulin detemir versus insulin glargine for type 2 diabetes mellitus 2011 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 2250 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

HbA1c, change from baseline (%)

1 finding from 1 review

Insulin monotherapy compared with the addition of oral glucose‐lowering agents to insulin for people with type 2… 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
9 studies · 698 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

HbA1c, change from baseline (%)

1 finding from 1 review

Insulin monotherapy compared with the addition of oral glucose‐lowering agents to insulin for people with type 2… 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 785 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

HbA1c, change from baseline (%)

1 finding from 1 review

Insulin monotherapy compared with the addition of oral glucose‐lowering agents to insulin for people with type 2… 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 448 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

HbA1c, change from baseline (%)

1 finding from 1 review

Insulin monotherapy compared with the addition of oral glucose‐lowering agents to insulin for people with type 2… 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 265 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

HbA1c, change from baseline (%)

1 finding from 1 review

Insulin monotherapy compared with the addition of oral glucose‐lowering agents to insulin for people with type 2… 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
9 studies · 316 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Change in HbA1c from baseline to endpoint ( · Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

1 finding from 1 review

Momordica charantia for type 2 diabetes mellitus 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 40 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

HbA1c change from baseline to end point (%) ( · patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes hbA1c change from baseline to end point (%) ( (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Colesevelam for type 2 diabetes mellitus 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
5 studies · 1315 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Change in HbA1c from baseline to endpoint % ( · patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

1 finding from 1 review

Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 (DPP‐4) inhibitors for type 2 diabetes mellitus 2008 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
14 studies · 6308 participants
High

Intervention not reported

Change in HbA1c from baseline to endpoint % ( · type 2 diabetes mellitus

1 finding from 1 review

Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 (DPP‐4) inhibitors for type 2 diabetes mellitus 2008 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
11 studies · 6907 participants
High

Intervention not reported

Change in HbA1c from baseline to endpoint ‐ Vildagliptin versus placebo % ( · patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

1 finding from 1 review

Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 (DPP‐4) inhibitors for type 2 diabetes mellitus 2008 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
6 studies · 1139 participants
High

Intervention not reported

Change in HbA1c from baseline to endpoint [%] ‐ Sitagliptin versus placebo % ( · type 2 diabetes mellitus

1 finding from 1 review

Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 (DPP‐4) inhibitors for type 2 diabetes mellitus 2008 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 1103 participants
High

Intervention not reported

Change in HbA1c from baseline to endpoint ‐ Sitagliptin versus another single hypoglycaemic agent % ( · type 2 diabetes mellitus

1 finding from 1 review

Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 (DPP‐4) inhibitors for type 2 diabetes mellitus 2008 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 592 participants
High

Intervention not reported

Change in HbA1c from baseline to endpoint ‐ Vildagliptin versus another single hypoglycaemic agent % ( · patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

1 finding from 1 review

Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 (DPP‐4) inhibitors for type 2 diabetes mellitus 2008 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 1764 participants
High