Question · asked by 1 review
Oral stimulation vs usual care: Length of hospital stay
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Oral stimulation vs standard care Total hospital stay (days) · preterm infants Oral stimulation for promoting oral feeding in preterm infants (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 5 studies · 249 participants | Very low |
Summary of findings table 1. Oral stimulation intervention vs standard care Total hospital stay (days) · preterm infants Oral stimulation for promoting oral feeding in preterm infants (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD009720.PUB2, superseded | no estimate extracted | 7 studies · 301 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oral stimulation for promoting oral feeding in preterm infants 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.