Question · asked by 1 review
Antispasmodics vs control: Duration of 1st stage of labour
- Population
- women in labour
- Intervention
- Antispasmodics
- Comparison
- control
- Outcome
- Duration of 1st stage of labour
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 2 · 100%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Antispasmodics vs control Duration of first stage of labour minutes · Women in labour Antispasmodics for labour (2013) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 13 studies · 1995 participants | Low |
Antispasmodics vs control Duration of first stage of labour (min) · patients in labour Antispasmodics for labour (2012) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD009243.PUB2, superseded | no estimate extracted | 11 studies · 1507 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antispasmodics for labour 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.