Cochrane · systematic review · CD009243
Antispasmodics for labour
Rohwer, AC, Khondowe, O, Young, T · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2013 · Cochrane Library
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
6
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 16.7%Low 4 · 66.7%Moderate 1 · 16.7%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Current version onlyAntispasmodics versus control
Population: Women in labour
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Duration of first stage of labour minutes Antispasmodics vs control | no estimate extracted | 13 studies · 1995 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency |
Duration of second stage of labour minutes Antispasmodics vs control | no estimate extracted | 10 studies · 1297 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency |
Duration of third stage of labour minutes Antispasmodics vs control | no estimate extracted | 5 studies · 765 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency |
Total duration of labour minutes Antispasmodics vs control | no estimate extracted | 7 studies · 797 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency |
Rate of cervical dilatation cm/h Antispasmodics vs control | no estimate extracted | 6 studies · 820 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency |
Rate of normal vertex deliveries Antispasmodics vs control | RR 1.02 [1, 1.05] | 16 studies · 2319 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |
Antispasmodics versus control
Population: patients in labour
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Duration of first stage of labour (min) Antispasmodics vs control | no estimate extracted | 11 studies · 1507 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency |
Duration of second stage of labour (min) Antispasmodics vs control | no estimate extracted | 9 studies · 1109 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency |
Duration of third stage of labour (min) Antispasmodics vs control | no estimate extracted | 4 studies · 577 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |
Total duration of labour (min) Antispasmodics vs control | no estimate extracted | 7 studies · 797 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency |
Rate of cervical dilatation (cm/h) Antispasmodics vs control | no estimate extracted | 5 studies · 632 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency |
Rate of normal vertex deliveries Antispasmodics vs control | RR 1.01 [0.99, 1.04] | 14 studies · 1831 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |