Question · asked by 1 review

School injury prevention programmes vs controls: Self‐reported medically or non‐medically attended unintentional injuries or injuries with an unspecified intent (injury rates adjusted for clustering)

School injury prevention programmes showed no clear difference in self‐reported medically or non‐medically attended unintentional… compared with controls (low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
School injury prevention programmes vs controls
Self‐reported medically or non‐medically attended unintentional injuries or injuries with an unspecified intent (injury rates adjusted for clustering) · children and young people
School injury prevention programmes showed no clear difference in self‐reported medically or non‐medically attended unintentional… compared with controls (low certainty).
School‐based education programmes for the prevention of unintentional injuries in children and young people (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Rate ratio 0.76 [0.49, 1.17]2 studies · 12977 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
School‐based education programmes for the prevention of unintentional injuries in children and young people
2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.