Cochrane · systematic review · CD010246
School‐based education programmes for the prevention of unintentional injuries in children and young people
Orton, E, Whitehead, J, Mhizha‐Murira, J, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2016 · Cochrane Library
InjuriesAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
5
current version
GRADE rated
5
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 60%Low 2 · 40%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
School injury prevention programmes compared to controls for the prevention of unintentional injuries in children and young people
Population: children and young people
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Self‐reported medically or non‐medically attended unintentional injuries or injuries with an unspecified intent (injury rates adjusted for clustering) School injury prevention programmes vs controls | Rate ratio 0.76 [0.49, 1.17] | 2 studies · 12977 participants | Low Downgraded: inconsistency |
Safety skills School injury prevention programmes vs controls | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 1751 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency |
Behaviour School injury prevention programmes vs controls | no estimate extracted | 9 studies · 52950 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |
Safety knowledge School injury prevention programmes vs controls | no estimate extracted | 9 studies · 55732 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |
Cost‐effectiveness School injury prevention programmes vs controls | no estimate extracted | 4639 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |