Case management vs usual care: Institutionalised (number of participants admitted to residential or nursing homes) at 10 ‐ 12 months
Case management showed no clear difference in institutionalised (number of participants admitted to residential or… compared with usual care (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Case management vs usual care Institutionalised (number of participants admitted to residential or nursing homes) at 10 ‐ 12 months · people with dementia Case management showed no clear difference in institutionalised (number of participants admitted to residential or… compared with usual care (low certainty). Case management approaches to home support for people with dementia (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | OR 0.95 [0.83, 1.08] | 9 studies · 5990 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case management approaches to home support for people with dementia 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.