Cochrane · systematic review · CD008345

Case management approaches to home support for people with dementia

Reilly, S, Miranda‐Castillo, C, Malouf, R, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2015 · Cochrane Library

SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
7
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 3 · 42.9%Moderate 2 · 28.6%High 2 · 28.6%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Case management versus usual care for people with dementia

Population: people with dementia
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Institutionalised (number of participants admitted to residential or nursing homes) at 10 ‐ 12 months
Case management vs usual care
OR 0.95 [0.83, 1.08]9 studies · 5990 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Time to institutionalisation at 12 months
Case management vs usual care
no estimate extracted1 study · 125 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Hospital admission (number of participants admitted) at 12 months
Case management vs usual care
OR 0.87 [0.59, 1.3]5 studies · 585 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Mortality (number of deaths) at 12 months
Case management vs usual care
OR 1 [0.83, 1.2]8 studies · 6112 participantsHigh
Quality of life (participants) at 12 months
Case management vs usual care
SMD 0.053 studies · 511 participantsHigh
Quality of life (carers) at 12 months
Case management vs usual care
SMD 0.21 [0.06, 0.37]5 studies · 681 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Carer burden at 10 ‐ 12 months
Case management vs usual care
no estimate extracted7 studies · 3772 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency