ProSeal vs Classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA): Regurgitation
ProSeal showed no clear difference in regurgitation compared with classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA) (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
ProSeal vs Classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA) Regurgitation · adult patients (18 years of age and older) for positive pressure ventilation undergoing elective surgery ProSeal showed no clear difference in regurgitation compared with classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA) (low certainty). ProSeal versus Classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA) for positive pressure ventilation in adults undergoing… (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.8 [0.24, 2.69] | 4 studies · 597 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| ProSeal versus Classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA) for positive pressure ventilation in adults undergoing elective surgery 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.