Question · asked by 1 review

Combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) vs Monotherapy or dual antiretroviral therapy: Oral hairy leukoplakia prevalence

Population
Children and adolescents (<18 years) living with HIV (CLWH)
Intervention
Combined antiretroviral therapy (cART)
Comparison
Monotherapy or dual antiretroviral therapy
Outcome
Oral hairy leukoplakia prevalence

No eligible studies compared oral hairy leukoplakia between different ART regimens.

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) vs Monotherapy or dual antiretroviral therapy
Oral hairy leukoplakia prevalence · Children and adolescents (<18 years) living with HIV (CLWH) · Hospitals and AIDS outpatient centres in India, Brazil, and several Asian countries
No eligible studies compared oral hairy leukoplakia between different ART regimens.
Impact of Antiretroviral Therapy on Oral Health among Children Living with HIV: A Systematic Review and… (2022) All outcomes
No eligible studies compared oral hairy leukoplakia between CLWH on different ART medications.0 studiesNo studies found

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Impact of Antiretroviral Therapy on Oral Health among Children Living with HIV: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
2022 All outcomes
2022-08-03 (inception to 3 August 2022)14Critically Low / Low
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.