Question · asked by 1 review
Planned elective birth (induction or caesarean) vs expectant management: Perinatal mortality
- Population
- pregnant women with gestational diabetes, between 38 ‐ 39 gestational weeks, without other maternal or fetal conditions.
- Intervention
- Planned elective birth (induction or caesarean)
- Comparison
- expectant management
- Outcome
- Perinatal mortality
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Planned elective birth (induction or caesarean) vs expectant management Perinatal mortality rate · pregnant women with gestational diabetes, between 38 ‐ 39 gestational weeks, without other maternal or fetal conditions. Planned birth at or near term for improving health outcomes for pregnant women with gestational diabetes and… (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 425 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Planned birth at or near term for improving health outcomes for pregnant women with gestational diabetes and their infants 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.