Question · asked by 1 review
Eugenol-based temporary cement vs Eugenol-free temporary cement: Pulp necrosis
- Population
- Vital teeth
- Intervention
- Eugenol-based temporary cement
- Comparison
- Eugenol-free temporary cement
- Outcome
- Pulp necrosis
The pooled incidence with eugenol-based temporary cement was 3.34%.
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 2 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Eugenol-based temporary cement vs Eugenol-free temporary cement Pulp necrosis incidence · Vital teeth · Eugenol-based The pooled incidence with eugenol-based temporary cement was 3.34%. Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023) All outcomes | Proportion 3.34 [1.66, 5.58] | 7043 participants | GRADE not reported |
Eugenol-based temporary cement vs Eugenol-free temporary cement Pulp necrosis incidence · Vital teeth · Eugenol-free The pooled incidence with eugenol-free temporary cement was 5.77%. Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023) All outcomes | Proportion 5.77 [3.72, 8.24] | 639 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations: a systematic review and… 2023 All outcomes | December 2022 (initial search October 2021, updated December 2022) | 68 | Not applicable |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.