Question · asked by 1 review
Summary of findings ‐ withdrawal of penicillin prophylaxis vs continuation: Compliance with treatment
- Population
- children with SCD who have been receiving prophylactic penicillin for at least two years
- Intervention
- Summary of findings ‐ withdrawal of penicillin prophylaxis
- Comparison
- continuation
- Outcome
- Compliance with treatment
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 2 · 100%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of findings ‐ withdrawal of penicillin prophylaxis vs continuation Compliance to treatment · children with SCD who have been receiving prophylactic penicillin for at least two years The review found no eligible studies for this question. Prophylactic antibiotics for preventing pneumococcal infection in children with sickle cell disease (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Summary of findings ‐ withdrawal of penicillin prophylaxis vs continuation Compliance to treatment · children with SCD who have been receiving prophylactic penicillin for at least two years The review found no eligible studies for this question. Prophylactic antibiotics for preventing pneumococcal infection in children with sickle cell disease (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD003427.PUB4, superseded | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prophylactic antibiotics for preventing pneumococcal infection in children with sickle cell disease 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.