Prefabricated foot orthoses vs shoes: Withdrawals due to adverse events
- Population
- children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and flat feet
- Intervention
- Prefabricated foot orthoses
- Comparison
- shoes
- Outcome
- Withdrawals due to adverse events
Prefabricated foot orthoses showed no clear difference in withdrawal due to adverse events compared with shoes; GRADE not reported.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Prefabricated foot orthoses vs shoes Withdrawal due to adverse events · children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and flat feet Prefabricated foot orthoses showed no clear difference in withdrawal due to adverse events compared with shoes; GRADE not reported. Foot orthoses for treating paediatric flat feet (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD006311.PUB3, superseded | RR 0.72 [0.14, 3.61] | Not reported | GRADE not reported |
Prefabricated foot orthoses vs shoes Withdrawal due to adverse events · children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and flat feet Prefabricated foot orthoses showed no clear difference in withdrawal due to adverse events compared with shoes; GRADE not reported. Foot orthoses for treating paediatric flat feet (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.72 [0.14, 3.61] | Not reported | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Foot orthoses for treating paediatric flat feet 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Prefabricated foot orthoses vs shoes · children with asymptomatic flat feet · 1 review
- Prefabricated foot orthoses vs shoes · children with symptomatic flat feet · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.